IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com> Wed, 14 September 2016 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: detnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E5812B23D for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:16:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LWuRz9TfTbls for <detnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22a.google.com (mail-yb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6733012B2AB for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id u125so7835698ybg.3 for <detnet@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:16:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OYFm7v/YzeB9blinPmapQ7+1na/wmsWI4vcmyetEQxg=; b=XIwCvyAbPGR1bLx/V6dZaxh45rfvOQAnJGvj69ET+mxPkXKfGJRFnFCmISogZ7aDWH S4UojrxLM9u+sPHPDhrhT1vCit5ZPE3imJWG4ZYuJRQ6Hgd3v9r5o4EEK3L9b1u/O+rg 7JdWX9aCHhNpS/w6W2xsmTnjanz1TUuqvzrjA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OYFm7v/YzeB9blinPmapQ7+1na/wmsWI4vcmyetEQxg=; b=jTTAeBoyeZpHSEFYN9nmylxc0SXtN3wIqayj/Bb3nKtHTTERY/yuDKewLNOayi8li1 YwlIgnv9BRYNnEeAIaEXaaa2/xLzHj9OaVvOr2rXC5pgWdsCsJEofAZhdg3/NYF/J3VO YyWskNpq0B1n5WEAkJZCaCNFwu4KFYzD27gRG2ayp6Ymws092qnRZOiDjQqryEhCcyZz YVGtVCZcvT4y+EOv8d8huySV3PMf9KUQCHukWOkXAKufmoZD2fVbO1TEfukkTJakbjUF uyiAABYKu80ohJhqsaIKtQZej/MhiBK4vF/uGAama63JUFTZXxepfJbphjrPpRpNfJpL nQOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNTEKwIKJvZ1l8wcOE2B6JGXokVwvwUT0IlUSW+X8j4bi0NLF+oaGoc9+yPOtobI2z4JkoQp5tTEZwziTyA
X-Received: by 10.37.50.205 with SMTP id y196mr1907425yby.32.1473851767531; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:16:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.103.82.2 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net>
References: <CAJt_5EiCuq2uv5R96uhSMrXdDJTvq52iS0cz-uZ=mizFv+ad+w@mail.gmail.com> <2b68a777-c951-ee05-7d0f-8ade257d9972@labn.net> <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C85DD807F7@MISOUT7MSGUSRDE.ITServices.sbc.com> <2fdead88-1ccc-54d5-4158-60f8bfa7650f@labn.net>
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.korhonen@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 04:15:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+GutmVFcik0sK=1ipx0f9LDR3K+oQR3-CxWE+NLSHYQ-L0=6g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146ded80ec593053c75db45"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/detnet/WX4Oh8y_lTipogBlvvMVlv1cF8o>
Cc: "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>
Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
X-BeenThere: detnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Deterministic Networking BoF and Proposed WG <detnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/detnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:detnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet>, <mailto:detnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 11:16:12 -0000

Folks,

I just submitted dp-alt-04 with BIER-TE carved out. I also implemented
grammar-only corrections proposed by Ethan.

- Jouni

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:

> Deborah,
>
>     message received.
>
> All,
>
> It looks like we'll need a new rev from the DT before publishing the WG
> version.  (Following option c in my message identified below [1].)
>
> Lou
>
> On 9/2/2016 2:08 PM, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was on vacation and still catching up on email - a couple of items
> from the charter:
> >
> > - BIER-TE is out-of-scope per the charter for detnet, so it should not
> be included even in a working group document.
> > - this document is not listed on your milestones, we need to keep focus
> on completing the chartered deliverables.
> >
> > Thanks - good weekends!
> > Deborah
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> >> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2016 7:48 AM
> >> To: Pat Thaler <pat.thaler@broadcom.com>; detnet@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Detnet] adoption of draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03?
> >>
> >> Sorry about being a day late on this.
> >>
> >> For the record, I want to restate my view from [1] that this document is
> >> not the right place for *any* mechanism definition -- and that the
> >> BIER-TE definitions should be removed prior to the document being
> >> published as an RFC.
> >>
> >> Lou
> >>
> >> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/detnet/current/msg00693.html
> >>
> >> On 8/19/2016 2:53 PM, Pat Thaler wrote:
> >>> All,
> >>>
> >>> This is start of a two-week poll on making
> >>> draft-dt-detnet-dp-alt-03 a working group document. Please
> >>> send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not
> >>> support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the
> >>> document.  If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd
> >>> like to see addressed once the document is a WG document.
> >>>
> >>> The poll ends April 1, 2016
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Pat Thaler
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> detnet mailing list
> >>> detnet@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> detnet mailing list
> >> detnet@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>



-- 
Jouni Korhonen, Broadcom Ltd.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email