Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam-08

Hi Tianran,
my apologies for the delayed response. Thank you for your thoughtful
comments. We, the authors, are discussing them and preparing our response
to answer your questions and address your comments. As you understand, time
is in short supply before the IETF draft submission cut-off deadline.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 7:50 PM Tianran Zhou <zhoutianran=
40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> I do not see any response to my comments.
>
> Reasonable? Or not?
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tianran
>
>
>
> *From:* detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tianran
> Zhou
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 13, 2022 11:38 AM
> *To:* Janos Farkas <Janos.Farkas=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>;
> detnet@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam-08
>
>
>
> Hi Authors,
>
>
>
> I read this draft and find it’s useful.
>
> I have several suggestions as follows.
>
> 1. I am not clear why existing PW OAM cannot be used directly for DetNet.
> I think there will be text to describe why 4 bytes are added, and also why
> each field, like node id.
>
> 2. There is no description for Level,  Flags, and Session fields on the
> meaning. I do not know how to use and how to extend.
>
> 3. “Channel Type - contains the value of DetNet Associated Channel Type.”
> This is confusing to me at first sight. It seem you are going to define a
> new channel type. I struggled a while before I understand finally. So it
> would be nice to revise the text.
>
> 4. You mentioned hybrid OAM a little bit in section 4. IMHO, it has
> nothing to do with this draft, including the solution, the format. So, I
> would suggest to clean up the hybrid OAM texts in this doc.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Tianran
>
>
>
> *From:* detnet [mailto:detnet-bounces@ietf.org <detnet-bounces@ietf.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Janos Farkas
> *Sent:* Tuesday, October 11, 2022 10:23 PM
> *To:* detnet@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [Detnet] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam-08
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> This starts working group last call on
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-mpls-oam/
>
>
>
> The working group last call ends on October 25th.
>
> Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
>
>
>
> No IPR has been disclosed against this document.
>
>
>
> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document and believe it is
> ready for publication", are welcome!
>
> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> János (DetNet Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)
> _______________________________________________
> detnet mailing list
> detnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/detnet
>