IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Fri, 06 September 2019 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95A8120044 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G35EHenYnQlE for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67B8F120043 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id 21so4162116otj.11 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bnvtTh+VJKyfvStw0Tfh52qrJFb9H5hlYa256w8V/P0=; b=KBoW9bdV1LXYc2T7XFmgSkkUrKaedF5oWH/qom9XS3DpfZYQf5f4+gY/TwudG7yvOg E75aWUbopAW/UpEvqvjsYGx0zt0IGHHldsHZujrwFcCv4l+U6UymWoeC++HDJxmvAtxw X6QNJYK2sAi4BXvZ6dNTCVcqqNZFP9S5DnPgMp9SIxPcraz+79tPRUAUNAh6u8rruOJM PRdtyAWs+DXc15Gw/311BBT0MrYcWoKvesTfA4Y1Ao0pquReDovUyxPTE2pzUFRR6BV5 HXVs00QSpK7c8+PRpu2/xyrRTFE6xMH2mzvbgI2lcNfoiJ2EoigzRbLIufNz7KBuc3vF qM8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bnvtTh+VJKyfvStw0Tfh52qrJFb9H5hlYa256w8V/P0=; b=lfHKMK7aj7T36exEhWWRh9AfXuCDY7vJ8nGO5d0Guyob/SWYVi5UjPfmffTHD97CoK kujhZxwUIAgr386tQYUe00ic095jaOZFK9d+Aqc+A2o4G0mqVpuLZybMaDdQ5Mc3hGRJ do/n8pUB2ni7PXAwZWDn8xJCfD8pB1oOS9m76Y8S7tijdEURnAqPEC0ugQHxRPbsB7F1 AEPOI2S99eJ8Lm294emX/cl6opyJQK36BWqntmeyMEfY7DPsdaRz8DM39eYGcUlRLuNP PORMtTr34JoLSWJ06G/cSiBU6DZzA7X/BeOauv2MpwhR6P3TVyPy2bre07ILUf1ygroW M2XQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWk7YZD1Y2BP62YrQAaroGFOY3OGaSk5vxYO/uYfwK/y5SifmjR jPFv6wXL6UDITr6I+o4KEEsJr04l
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw1iMPboE4sMXrLl9Rz8b2EN0hcUZ3SGKAI9Arc0KBeqWOtK8V+HhVh3vcrjwNXSAx2cribDw==
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:152:: with SMTP id 76mr5368195otu.18.1567731768426; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:02:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:d981:1a68:7c5f:511c? ([2600:1700:a3a0:4c80:d981:1a68:7c5f:511c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n22sm1290375otk.28.2019.09.05.18.02.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:02:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <728d7df1-d563-82f4-bfb3-a65a75fdd662@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwacbAT04tckpPcRcnOt=1QByOBeJ7uDf6rNK6NRwtxZYg@mail.gmail.com> <ffa2bf72-3024-237b-86ae-9cc04babeec6@gmail.com> <74a0ea49-7a46-4eb6-c297-cd703f63bd1b@gmail.com> <C64C3370-6D04-43C9-9602-CDCB13406981@kitterman.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1e1aa6bd-82cb-5ce0-290c-c3eaf8566c4d@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 18:02:45 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C64C3370-6D04-43C9-9602-CDCB13406981@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/5n0drwQprHszvUp-PX325ii42Kc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] Comment on draft-ietf-dmarc-psd
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 01:02:51 -0000

On 9/5/2019 2:49 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I don't think so.  The draft defines PSD as org - 1.


Writing a definition for something you don't control and that can (and 
has) change tends to be problematic.

As it is here.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email