IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 24 October 2017 01:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A49139F67 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2CJLHjlqmYh9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x236.google.com (mail-wr0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E6E313942F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x236.google.com with SMTP id o44so19130142wrf.11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=95kKdyLq/fkk2jyLtnMbK+ktlr+TfxwRPwzNFb9zDFU=; b=Yz326elcnQzq7QGRv515bflWK5CAYgsmGXvTK6NcLm1IiGd6HO7qTWBU2x2sRbXuJF F+VZBWCWh8lCAEi4QRus9lipzgX5s9znSuHq123pTzOuTusWqb0BnTtQHSmYx2JQjs4L qf9aXEGacsr4XEg3+pgg31/iiUD4H6FP77Zfd3qyC4ez//FTUi68od6MZ0gjTAi2T+3r NFwoA4iD7e98vXCeKupqemgraFaH2GRwvIiU5x6tPPsEErA9uXRK4ucw2rjZYcCZUw8q lU3AnTuvgMFKpBxoRsOqBVt/nYy1TmMXhC3ODnap/lwf6iu1HocfyaD2chX7tLUsqBL/ mn2g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=95kKdyLq/fkk2jyLtnMbK+ktlr+TfxwRPwzNFb9zDFU=; b=QZluoLMnyu/vfRcRIDdiunEHroOMvHEo51WnHZ/YI5iR5yh2gsgS0ifTSX2TT3eegG YSRrvH2H9rqQpIcztNAYg2bZlnwdwb8A9GdgNXHLV83lQj5r6iNjoLDTykZBWvRUQqq8 qpHqluXiBvOwyDcv0jpymGoGgy6Vt0wRP2Px0YuGGiRDh7sGO8TuRu0CUxBYlwEXW0LH K2a+S/Qz0lD6TcK7o0oRNTgDoUfQTZohkhvllI0gMbKU90ZMfwF0RMOqSn0yg0OH3Rwn 8E6I0c6h/6KkhATDEyVC0OR8GBUCoaq3+QAsMHOsUGNZEfBf5uhB+7CNtmT1NKsLeZ+O Uzkw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVnHPGT54sHlLfpJrfHfZH39pY0umXyKQpZFDzUss39xA2Q1vVR eYbKXbZGIAyFqxlQy3M+KXh5FuIwoZQH3TbAHFM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Tk3yC2G9C+wi98JuPkYpJuk2N1P/tkfmQA+innl/OAqPQsgbFUIuwKEylVxKlSZ9rN/7qjRru+xVRsg7bjEuo=
X-Received: by 10.223.181.131 with SMTP id c3mr12763401wre.198.1508809942706; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.184.60 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 18:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <89a93742-2917-2125-df8f-b14905218d0f@nic.cz>
References: <20170911013510.17202.qmail@ary.lan> <yblr2vcxzjn.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CAHw9_iKYefDLxbDBv7FAzqJyjgVpJHhkxqPbms8oHe2knOX6tA@mail.gmail.com> <bdfd5d78-4e04-f8d1-f653-f3859cfe999a@eff.org> <89a93742-2917-2125-df8f-b14905218d0f@nic.cz>
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 21:52:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+E9ADK93X7f4O=0_miJN5OjJOnRoi_g36A5uSeCKydQeg@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f40304388b78ab2ef9055c4130e3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/wy4zH84BLZ5LzWqyFwfqIQhtmKQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 01:52:26 -0000

The Call For Adoption ended some time ago, and I spent some time reading
the comments.

There is consensus to adopt this, *but* there is also a enough of an
concern that some of the issues raised be addressed.   We'll want to make
sure all issues are addressed.

tim

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 5:12 AM, Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz> wrote:

>
>
> On 9.10.2017 22:20, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews wrote:
> > On 10/09/2017 01:16 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
> >> So, that's my (new) views, and the thread seemed to have stalled. I
> >> believe that the security implications of having  localhost queries
> >> leak into the DNS is bad, and there is significant evidence that this
> >> is happening. I get that there is no answer that will make everyone
> >> happy, but now that we've had some time to mull over this, where did
> >> we end up?
> > My feeling of the list is that your view matches the rough consensus:
> > stub resolvers are responsible for resolving localhost to 127.0.0.1, and
> > queries for localhost should not hit the network, as described in the
> draft.
>
> I agree, consider it as one data point in your "rough consensus"
> estimation.
>
> --
> Petr Špaček  @  CZ.NIC
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email