IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90

"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Wed, 30 April 2014 02:48 UTC

Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C5C1A09AD for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YqCn7euUM3oP for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov [IPv6:2001:4d0:a302:1100::101]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90681A083C for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 19:48:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.199]) by ndjsnpf01.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C47D0711; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:45:07 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NDJSCHT103.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht103-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.203]) by ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s3U2mc27026949; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:48:38 -0500
Received: from NDJSMBX203.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.231]) by NDJSCHT103.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.203]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 21:48:38 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: "l.wood@surrey.ac.uk" <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk>, "stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie" <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "Burleigh, Scott C (JPL-312G)[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90
Thread-Index: Ac9gm6lQ2b5cYk0ST2ahfwxoAWKLegANntCAAFG8qAAACmKFgAABZQiAACYvnAAABN7HgAAAafMAAAUXG4D//8ZrAIAAil4AgAAMWICAAA/sAIAALmEAgAHesID//78pgA==
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:48:37 +0000
Message-ID: <CF85DB72.161C5%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <1398825650884.64103@surrey.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [184.56.61.175]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A289F29E0759564FB67DC6259A4BC7C5@mail.nasa.gov>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.96, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-04-29_07:2014-04-30, 2014-04-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/34I-hiaa7pHlxRbQI2rk0q85bJY
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:48:42 -0000

On 4/29/14 10:40 PM, "l.wood@surrey.ac.uk" <l.wood@surrey.ac.uk> wrote:

>> DTN can provide useful functions, but isn't worth it because
>> mimicing the bits of DTN function at the application layer is easier for
>> application developers overall.
>
>This holds for e.g. bundle protocol security. It's unneeded; apps can
>roll their own.

Payload can be handle by the source to destination.  That is what emails
does.

IMHO, one would want to validate the source as I might not want to store
anything from Lloyd (sorry Lloyd), 100 Mbytes from Scott and 20 Gbytes
from Stephen (since he agreed to pay half my monthly phone bill).  I'm not
about to let just anyone use my truck.

Will

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email