IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90

Eric Travis <eric.dot.travis@gmail.com> Tue, 29 April 2014 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.dot.travis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F501A0991 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jJjSjExQMwko for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027C1A0953 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ld13so1197314vcb.30 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2EwnFeMDTZmPqeI1UKSwquoWdZwvqNY1geBgn2ealp8=; b=zUROrDj+d3f/ldeFGs7cSDKmhMxCPggyjrp6k1R1/egPPe5IIbs1cvPCfw/vulP7rJ R4RQhLCCYvDTTi6iCvpJGrwacfkbX5a9RWhxd79JjobSwdLllHBSLd8SnM6+WOJkdnca R4YrusRA4hWIcAiuYp2SZnczRc4NlV33ByPIalqvVgBCKH6FP6tXCclDP7BNlbxZflCO 1B/DZbmUlLPvzO9pvgPTRB8q/6nioUhLCV9D4guDSzkSp+Sc3VycxO4jzedVfv9wDWjK cYjYgzhQALzAb/Nd8WZwoz26f8A4YZYNB5QWw4Rl+88dZ+8JFFTzT8p6K7RagxXPfWAE f9xQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.58.31.136 with SMTP id a8mr505881vei.20.1398811440952; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.14.70 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B293C7C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B28DD43@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <535A954D.6030007@cs.tcd.ie> <535CB9D4.301@netlab.tkk.fi> <535CFF85.7080804@cs.tcd.ie> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E9989B92@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <535E0924.4050600@netlab.tkk.fi> <535E29D3.1040304@cs.tcd.ie> <535E2C9A.7010605@netlab.tkk.fi> <535E4EC3.6090402@cs.tcd.ie> <535E5628.8080509@netlab.tkk.fi> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E9989B96@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <535E5AB7.8030002@netlab.tkk.fi> <290E20B455C66743BE178C5C84F1240847E9989B97@EXMB01CMS.surrey.ac.uk> <535E6FF7.40509@netlab.tkk.fi> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B292788@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <F80A5681-7BF8-4F97-834D-32B19BFEFBF6@netapp.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B293570@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983181B293C7C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:44:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKovV0wwGas3LB9mU+5uygzMRynZ7=93_+7M1DmYGxLr8qAf4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Travis <eric.dot.travis@gmail.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b2e49d00bbb1104f8362b89"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/ENu-UxCS4EtqOSCs545Mh5RL-rc
Cc: "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 22:44:04 -0000

Fred,

Regardless of whether the path forward is - via a WG or via independent
submission, I believe that a 5050.Bis
(or whatever the result is called) should *bundle* - pardon the
unintentional pun - or otherwise coalesce
(the content and "fixes" to):

       o  RFC 5050 Bundle Protocol Specification
       o  Streamlined Bundle Security Protocol (SBSP)
                                        and
       o  Bundle in Bundle Encapsulation (still an I-D?)

into a SINGLE, comprehensive bundle specification document.  This will help
to ensure any tweaks/fixes to the
existing RFC-5050 will be addressed more holistically.  For sake of
completeness,  I'd add the content of RFC 6260
(Compressed Bundle Header Encoding) and the existing UDP and TCP
convergence layers to that list.

The effort starts with a melding of the existing content, and continues
with whatever tweaks/modifications that are
deemed appropriate/desirable for advancing the documented flavor of DTN.

And since I'm rudely suggesting things, may I inquire as to why this needs
to wait?

The ground-work for preparing the existing documentation can begin *now*
within the existing infrastructure of the
DTNRG.  This provides almost 3 months of lead-time and momentum (and
demonstration of energy/commitment) going
into a DTN BoF.

Apologies and Regards,

Eric
eric.dot.travis@gmail.com



On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Templin, Fred L
<Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>wrote:

> Lars,
>
> > Yes, I have used the AD sponsored publication path in the past. My
> > unspoken assumption was that getting an AD to support publication
> > on a per-document basis would be difficult when there are really
> > a number of documents that we would like to progress.
>
> So, to complete the thought, I am not seeing this as a "one or two
> docs and done" prospect. We already have four work items on the draft
> charter and have had a number or requests for additional work items.
> IMHO, that level of interest fits the profile of a working group
> moreso than one-off AD shopping.
>
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> dtn-interest mailing list
> dtn-interest@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest
>



-- 


*The problem with the worlld is that the intelligent people are full of
doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.*

*
- Charles Bukowski*

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email