IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90

"Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov> Fri, 02 May 2014 20:24 UTC

Return-Path: <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
X-Original-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F9D1A0928 for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 13:24:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qk53uERcSHrQ for <dtn-interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov [IPv6:2001:4d0:a302:1100::102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865D21A0913 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 13:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.199]) by ndjsnpf02.ndc.nasa.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF3FA80DE for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:24:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from NDJSCHT113.ndc.nasa.gov (ndjscht113-pub.ndc.nasa.gov [198.117.1.213]) by ndjsppt105.ndc.nasa.gov (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s42KOA3v004689 for <dtn-interest@irtf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:24:10 -0500
Received: from NDJSMBX203.ndc.nasa.gov ([169.254.2.231]) by NDJSCHT113.ndc.nasa.gov ([198.117.1.213]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 2 May 2014 15:24:10 -0500
From: "Ivancic, William D. (GRC-RHN0)" <william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
To: "Burleigh, Scott C (JPL-312G)[Jet Propulsion Laboratory]" <scott.c.burleigh@jpl.nasa.gov>, "dtn-interest@irtf.org" <dtn-interest@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90
Thread-Index: Ac9gm6lQ2b5cYk0ST2ahfwxoAWKLegANntCAAFG8qAAACmKFgAABZQiAACYvnAAABN7HgAAAafMAAAUXG4D//8ZrAIAAil4AgAAMWICAAA/sAIAALmEAgAHesID//78pgIAAXMqAgABKNYCAAwDlAIAAjqkAgAAU/YA=
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 20:24:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CF897532.16A48%william.d.ivancic@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <A5BEAD028815CB40A32A5669CF737C3B4238A33F@ap-embx-sp40.RES.AD.JPL>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.8.130913
x-originating-ip: [184.56.61.175]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF89753216A48williamdivancicnasagov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.11.96, 1.0.14, 0.0.0000 definitions=2014-05-02_07:2014-05-02,2014-05-02,1970-01-01 signatures=0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dtn-interest/nerCksqn48y4mJ_eF9cczDePCxk
Subject: Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90
X-BeenThere: dtn-interest@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "The Delay-Tolerant Networking Research Group \(DTNRG\) - Announce." <dtn-interest.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/dtn-interest/>
List-Post: <mailto:dtn-interest@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtn-interest>, <mailto:dtn-interest-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 20:24:15 -0000

Some really nice slides from Scott- seriously.  I found these while preparing for a talk.
These do a nice job of highlight the difference between CFDP and DTN.

http://chapters.comsoc.org/comsig/Slides/Jan2004_BurleighS_IPN_DTN.pdf

Interesting that reactive fragmentation is called out.  I was not a big fan originally, but not I feel it is a requirement.

Has anyone done reactive fragmentation over LTP?  I was the beneficiary over TCP.

Stephen, was your experience with reactive fragmentation over TCP or some other convergence layer?


Will

******************************

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email