Re: [dtn-interest] DTN BoF Proposal for IETF90

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

Hi Fred,

On 28/04/14 23:27, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> I submitted some mini problem statement drafts that touch on areas
> that I think would need to be addressed in a 5050bis, but my list
> was not exhaustive. Scott also posted a laundry list of 5050bis
> candidate items last year. In terms of Boeing's interests, security
> is a high priority for us for what we think we need in the near term.

All that's fair enough and sorry to hammer on about this, but I
do think its important to get this clear for the scoping of the
BoF/WG.

You say "not exhaustive" but do you mean that from your POV
your list is all you're really interested in working on? Which
would be entirely ok IMO, nothing wrong with that, but I think
it'd mean you're not interested in a re-design of 5050 but more
of a bug-fix type approach.

(Again, to be clear: by re-design, I mean to keep the gatewaying-
to-5050 ability but to look again at how we represent bundles
to see if its possible to come up with something much more easily
deployed.)

S.