Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> Tue, 23 May 2023 03:33 UTC
Return-Path: <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03821C14CE42 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:33:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8ax_MPuqsvf for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A649C14CEFE for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-510d92184faso652924a12.1 for <eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:33:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684812787; x=1687404787; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kw5DHEdM6MFAOPWCgLaVN+/1VOo8IMo4iqfwN+iWTyk=; b=C7Z+V/9RyGV3lF07i5QG5keLKKBDkAqoa+VAykvZwSecmkxpCFDNabY3055gNG/8li TT9v+wjheaQdxVJ8JgskQxJ3vWvo5105XhbkX2T0jIetLRjrPC369HbdhSEeX5ndRQQq Gww+M1DBA+s0/fs8bJSjj96LCwEBZLKzfD6HZHDvWAQ9qyf5ktis8ooDHwwJRNh0kepj SRz3z1Fxne6Pk7Z9d9QD7DYE9cuwgX1Zw71v+RmXnBlulaFBF/Q10DpZNSyTWtFeIheJ elKed0T61rcIUh8yevLeeCsjQmrMR3tEvEovjhl4Unz5ss+TMifxoirEt3R5BltBEDWP a0zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684812787; x=1687404787; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=kw5DHEdM6MFAOPWCgLaVN+/1VOo8IMo4iqfwN+iWTyk=; b=An/f5G1/6k2BSmFkzzuG2TwfcY282ib81nsvgC/LaI1ktUi8BNnJK2d3J9mV3h55ct hGoFoxO0vUGGQKPYzq09B/gV43R6k7EvglQEsbIBARsWTnH6K6ZbW1yH/asbTOZ8tdih cdo2zBBjR6DMSHzv40myhPyqjDWL5HC2/8XM0FyHaRrJNUQIGShG8wdfeTMMP1HwBLpR M9kurXX4ZIrILS+UGPQtRD6WgFTzg4Pw95k9Czsw3RuWnEm6vAXElatL2oMJIRAHdUhx yDQJybiQCuLTw58YHc4/ICoUfsdSzLZb9gw0BdSGZD/yOfVw3TQv5FZT8sHbXF6yWD30 CNbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwFafrNXSaA4amuNuTpTk56/NGd0YMCvKGoOLkoValZh5LMXkR5 dmftiYWVWJ8hmm1nwUqywfl0Qg79dgXwQyXXKXroVv9x
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4BVhbzf+24VUNmLGaULiaigSPgulMKeiA8GXFKlADMRjZ0Q0iH1zkFPpDVooQ0BLTmgji7wvwOGhvCCr8y1MA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d157:b0:968:4ce9:677a with SMTP id br23-20020a170906d15700b009684ce9677amr11537132ejb.38.1684812787200; Mon, 22 May 2023 20:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <54F373CD-1E97-42BC-9AAB-0451ABD9D448@eggert.org> <52d600e9-c5fd-a086-9690-d4ac4a6d6de2@nostrum.com> <e1715390-46c8-528f-ad12-254313e2267c@gmail.com> <18664.1684799255@localhost> <7d91e9ac-67a1-c3b1-6523-54e7b0fc151d@gmail.com> <CALaySJJOZOpBxmSrxSq8ki8dfHG1egdqm9c=WnmcGUCU0iuWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJOZOpBxmSrxSq8ki8dfHG1egdqm9c=WnmcGUCU0iuWHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 23:32:55 -0400
Message-ID: <CAF4+nEE56uS4PA_ki3B_coTPwf1UbOnC0kJQ0qJ1DDso04TwHw@mail.gmail.com>
To: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b1b74805fc540b7a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/6beUQYYRHyHOS9Nuavkmf1WlkHc>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: Notification for draft-eastlake-rfc3797bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 03:33:14 -0000
Hi, Yes, I would like the draft to be published as an RFC at some point. On the question of whether re-randomization is needed, I am personally ambivalent but, based on my experience with the stringency with which the community seems to want the nomcom procedures and rules to be enforced, I suspect that the community supports re-randomization. Furthermore, while it does increase time pressure, I believe it can be reasonably scheduled. If people want this to go through GENDISPATCH, I'm willing to present it in San Francisco. Thanks, Donald =============================== Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell) 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA d3e3e3@gmail.com On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:17 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > Personally: > I don't see any reason not to keep the "elegy" working group with a > new charter that's designed for the new work. I don't really care if > the WG nickname no longer directly refers to the work, and I'm happy > to continue chairing. > > Barry > > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:12 PM Brian E Carpenter > <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 23-May-23 11:47, Michael Richardson wrote: > > > > > > Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I concur with Robert, so I think the next stop is gendispatch. > > > > > > Okay, but is one of the gendispatch option to recharter ELEGY? > > > Or is that already excluded from the list of options in your opinion? > > > > > > (Asking for information) > > > > I actually don't care. If gendispatch decides that a full WG process is > > need, it would a be a fairly profound recharter. The charter says > > "No other aspect of NomCom selection or operation is in scope", and I > > can't quite make up a suitable acronym, but I'm sure we can find one > > if we have to. > > > > Brian > > > > > > -- > > Eligibility-discuss mailing list > > Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss > > -- > Eligibility-discuss mailing list > Eligibility-discuss@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss >
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Robert Sparks
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Lars Eggert
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Joel Halpern
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Paul Hoffman
- [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] NomCom selection Fwd: N… Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Christian Huitema
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael StJohns
- [Eligibility-discuss] list address (was: Re: On 3… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] list address (was: Re: … Rob Sayre
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael StJohns
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Salz, Rich
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives Martin Thomson