IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Thu, 01 June 2023 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DAFC14CE5D for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oh2TFQ9DxMqV for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A727EC14CF05 for <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 07:17:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122330.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 351DtVDB021053; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 15:16:24 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=Pp+cEoCdB8YosCwnCv7U/hNpAkG0k5E+ltIS30Dt1mw=; b=ZP92OjnkWIJCcOlwi2JqWYZAA9jDQhccBPIYOG+2lOVQXpflb+9SzxXgg3jC7GXelIM3 qkIj2nReXyu6xjrGNPMAZa36mVAZL5NeWKCxzjhx+bZMokUZKQB80I18hGMU4WnA3kg2 HIxEdprWjNRQznpM7Pw5cJBSrSw62CI6OLrVW7Q0dfwQ4vdmF3SdQdjohZgG7qTh/+4/ bfkYfkE1YYF4v7ConPnUxTskBPAPoqs6Q/iwqi//2bKyUsljYl8hAiXiKGoPAowWDfIN RQTJQ5QFG2YXUx83z220poUnFeg4uZuVnYEtOiY9fpdWuUQAOcdR2Sj45pCaxh5R+5tB PQ==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3quast6597-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:16:23 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 351Dk4BC007026; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:16:23 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.24]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3qud6wwx18-2 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 01 Jun 2023 10:16:22 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.23) by usma1ex-dag4mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.91.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1118.26; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:16:22 -0400
Received: from usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.23]) by usma1ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.91.23]) with mapi id 15.02.1118.026; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 10:16:22 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
CC: "eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com" <eligibility-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>
Thread-Topic: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHZk+sKDWK1/+uS7kWQ3IZVXm1FJ6908kQAgAAIigCAAC7LgIAACIIAgAC2eICAABbegA==
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 14:16:22 +0000
Message-ID: <8320D717-9BE0-4B94-8CE4-B560AA7B9BC0@akamai.com>
References: <CAChr6Szvewhk0_z5DVqTJ37qR6eHxBw0Am2MnycxsS=a9x_bzw@mail.gmail.com> <4b2070b2-21e7-4887-b9a2-1049b930d0be@betaapp.fastmail.com> <CAChr6SyLNfEHxSCaj+w_j4Zzxf0vLudqzfpsGO7kDd1jO1AFLg@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEGAsAvD4Vzy7BVOKVE+5wnGspP+QC+_bYKEWfYihVYdsA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Swg5An=n9gAo1dYA=U_DY-Qd5h48Aq6Wqhf=QUae9pB7Q@mail.gmail.com> <BY5PR11MB4196BD7045991FDB8FDE8DA1B5499@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BY5PR11MB4196BD7045991FDB8FDE8DA1B5499@BY5PR11MB4196.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.73.23051401
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8320D7179BE04B948CE4B560AA7B9BC0akamaicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-06-01_08,2023-05-31_03,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxlogscore=403 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2306010124
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: EHQLBPhNoV3Amyzl3-_B7pEN9vcZQKWO
X-Proofpoint-GUID: EHQLBPhNoV3Amyzl3-_B7pEN9vcZQKWO
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.254,Aquarius:18.0.957,Hydra:6.0.573,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2023-06-01_08,2023-05-31_03,2023-05-22_02
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 mlxlogscore=340 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2304280000 definitions=main-2306010125
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eligibility-discuss/viIAUEVW-QEmVYrkwNxXT_XnINA>
Subject: Re: [Eligibility-discuss] On 3797 alternatives
X-BeenThere: eligibility-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF eligibility procedures <eligibility-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eligibility-discuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:eligibility-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eligibility-discuss>, <mailto:eligibility-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 14:17:10 -0000

But if the ballot needs to be rerun because someone can’t serve then allow other more expedient sources of random data to be used to mitigate unnecessarily slowing down the process.

That is an important question. Precedent says to “just pick the next one on the list” without re-seeding. It is what has been done previously, most recently as this past NomCom. RFC 8713 implies you reseed, and I cannot see how to do that without taking approximately two weeks to do the whole process (announce, confirm, select, challenge).

This difference is why I said a couple of weeks ago, that we should resolve that first before looking at 3797bis.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email