IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?

Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@gmail.com> Thu, 02 June 2016 08:18 UTC

Return-Path: <rolf.winter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: eman@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735B312B050 for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:18:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nbEom0lQc4cG for <eman@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22e.google.com (mail-yw0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6562312B038 for <eman@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id x189so43117360ywe.3 for <eman@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 01:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j41bi9Uw6UfEVdkHIYrRZXAq8+a/evjX8O9C1F4Fc1Q=; b=Wg+2IYm5kB1AYd7EduS1e72Nxm/khwH34jQima/8osQUhSeipkQrBRlJIYHif5nwoo esEsGvT6I4ifLY8m/KPEgDnZ1bPxn6Y84+BqkshZxmWwTl00zU8Daf3rExFf2a6WrhWu WBqCOOGZs0t4WAohPqfytghdVw9RMRquQhfAxpe/W+S8GULxWilYODMUgnRErw6erlBt 5bUDG3Ew+3o5eGRcrMuyHper54KkHqyVgTs06SxAV//KlXECrKsR9nWB441sVIy3xVBe H0Zhtd7se4hk8ngRg1WqtBRCjB9Qq1r91V5QHungbMwiYzY1EbW9KprZy7GcUJoxFKO7 sxMg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=j41bi9Uw6UfEVdkHIYrRZXAq8+a/evjX8O9C1F4Fc1Q=; b=icoIC+AH3xEKniZpgm27YwZMgo/7HN+GbqnMnNm837kU2lkMyU0dHf1WqyqWMqJhgh SuNjrZ19VjztR/Y0WfWPPDihAvhrwypTasJ0WdKXsVaWxQ25/x9AvjTFl5ri5GeOpUq9 oKAjIPaxf4ing+JRd24hByHJORnsLvKBsByjH3BV7qrYwwcXXCGHPSl0Fz45EMmVzyoH cFhmFQVQKaVPNpmRsxV6pumfG6qSehOPR94HDz7ytsHRuXDChUoVT8TeCxb4fiVFuKDc Gvw85ZHKQ1fZ0anE2kBPo8Zz20RglnCQ8JIAnJ01ojmFOMvgxMGfmAkba0cgkAYi6yhL +imA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK+iYJJ1OJEuGoeP83heI5ZA8FsOgRh7Yh9wHE8/4OsGckb6zWqMJ5koKUS9cvA5zOnUSyUetUnBflx4g==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.129.94.5 with SMTP id s5mr5125256ywb.71.1464855526563; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 01:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.37.4.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2016 01:18:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com>
References: <556E820E.4040208@bogus.com> <55720A99.2030407@cisco.com> <944DE63C-1467-4EC2-976F-24C46588693F@lucidvision.com> <D19C53A1.43722%moulchan@cisco.com> <dc75c6ae-8992-9f2b-9e0f-937eeb6bf54b@gmail.com> <9494BFE6-4782-4B9B-B4BC-B9C474F1C93D@lucidvision.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 10:18:46 +0200
Message-ID: <CADfatQ1_632NcmK9jZW9mc=fANEFnnFp2-q130ffZTavt+GsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@gmail.com>
To: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/eman/D5kJQkGtl5JrYZOrKkhYRkWfPx8>
Cc: eman@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [eman] energy-specific efforts at IETF?
X-BeenThere: eman@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the Energy Management Working Group <eman.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/eman/>
List-Post: <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman>, <mailto:eman-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 08:18:49 -0000

Is there anything that the EMAN work is not addressing or that
requires new protocol work?

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> wrote:
>
>         Not that I know of in the form of an official working group. EMAN was shut down something like a year ago.
>
>         --Tom
>
>> On Jun 1, 2016:8:34 AM, at 8:34 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is there any other effort focusing on energy consumption happening at IETF currently?
>>
>> I am interested in aspects related to energy consumption of IP networks used to deliver video streams.
>>
>> Yours,
>>
>> Alex Petrescu
>>
>> Le 09/06/2015 à 05:01, Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan) a écrit :
>>> Thanks to all the WG chairs for shepherding the IETF drafts and taking
>>> them to a conclusion.
>>> I may not be able to travel to Prague.  So, enjoy.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Mouli
>>>
>>> From: Nadeau Thomas <tnadeau@lucidvision.com
>>> <mailto:tnadeau@lucidvision.com>>
>>> Date: Saturday, 6 June 2015 2:22 AM
>>> To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>>
>>> Cc: eman mailing list <eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>>,
>>> "eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>"
>>> <eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org <mailto:eman-chairs@tools.ietf.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [eman] Status of the EMAN W.G. effort.
>>>
>>>
>>>    Beers are on you! 8)
>>>
>>>
>>>>    On Jun 5, 2015:4:46 PM, at 4:46 PM, Benoit Claise
>>>>    <bclaise@cisco.com <mailto:bclaise@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    Yes, thanks to the contributors, document editors, WG chairs,
>>>>    previous ADs :-), basically the entire EMAN community.
>>>>    Celebration in Prague? Fine with me.
>>>>
>>>>    Regards, Benoit
>>>>>    Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>>    Now that we've crossed the milstone of having
>>>>>    draft-ietf-eman-applicability-statement-11 move to the RFC editor queue,
>>>>>    I think we can pause and reflect on the effort that has completed. It
>>>>>    took a while to get here and the consensus that we built was hard won
>>>>>    but I hope durable.
>>>>>
>>>>>    It's my intention to close down the working group, maintaining the
>>>>>    mailing list for a time. The mailing list archive as with other IETF
>>>>>    mailing lists will be preserved. in the immediate sense if there is work
>>>>>    around the edges of this space we have the opsawg working group to
>>>>>    support such activities.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Thank you again for your diligent efforts, especially the present and
>>>>>    former chairs who shepherded this work to the point that it is at now.
>>>>>
>>>>>    Regards
>>>>>    Joel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>    eman mailing list
>>>>>    eman@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>>
>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>    eman mailing list
>>>>    eman@ietf.org <mailto:eman@ietf.org>
>>>>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> eman mailing list
>>> eman@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> eman mailing list
>> eman@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> eman@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email