IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

"Steven G. Huter" <sghuter@nsrc.org> Tue, 12 April 2016 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <sghuter@nsrc.org>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F13D12E0EF for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RajeT1a0U_pu for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nsrc.org (mail.nsrc.org [128.223.157.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7AE12D93E for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.nsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD42700D46; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nsrc.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.nsrc.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id JVGZ3lvOWzUq; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail.nsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2292700D65; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.nsrc.org
Received: from mail.nsrc.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail.nsrc.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id IAzphEs5PCUD; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell.nsrc.org (shell.nsrc.org [IPv6:2607:8400:2880:4::80df:9d34]) by mail.nsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B08A0700D46; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:30:27 -0700
From: "Steven G. Huter" <sghuter@nsrc.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <570C41E0.5050701@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1604112029570.9289@shell.nsrc.org>
References: <CAKLmikPYuSrE69e5neDxOu+5+aUUJm_=vknaZxx3yBsWzfBHvw@mail.gmail.com> <00e601d19400$f7bf3830$e73da890$@unizar.es> <CAKLmikO854rB0H_DAL8oKD0EWuxx_ZsXWeZy89xB78TaHT4mNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPaG1A=s-4qboskb1b+8HmjABLcD7Fa6hKJrUxPvVztHjeVTug@mail.gmail.com> <570C41E0.5050701@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/5ttWepF7KQyUNMZKF4_9WVKdAcY>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>, Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 03:30:51 -0000

> While I do think this draft could be published as an RFC now
> with no harm accruing, my personal prediction is that all
> involved will end up happier in the longer term if we do
> try to discuss recent comments, which are not insubstantial
> (but which are also not showstoppers). I reckon that's true
> even if it's also for sure annoying for those who've been
> working on this text a while.

I agree with you, Stephen.

Steven Huter, NSRC
https://nsrc.org/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email