IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Tue, 12 April 2016 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DEC12E40E for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.917
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.917 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQRrD5ty2k45 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx141.netapp.com (mx141.netapp.com [216.240.21.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C0612E40D for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,472,1455004800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="111967579"
Received: from hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.41]) by mx141-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2016 22:21:45 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.40) by hioexcmbx08-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.41) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1156.6; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:21:41 -0700
Received: from HIOEXCMBX07-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([::1]) by hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com ([fe80::c07c:8fcd:f7e4:f32b%21]) with mapi id 15.00.1156.000; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 22:21:41 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Thread-Topic: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
Thread-Index: AQHRk4Q2CcuNNvkhoUmbAqiDjQ6OQZ+FUD4AgAD0eIA=
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:21:41 +0000
Message-ID: <C4D77DF0-A5FF-4472-8A02-BA136B8727D7@netapp.com>
References: <CAKLmikPYuSrE69e5neDxOu+5+aUUJm_=vknaZxx3yBsWzfBHvw@mail.gmail.com> <00e601d19400$f7bf3830$e73da890$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <00e601d19400$f7bf3830$e73da890$@unizar.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.120.60.35]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DCFEF2CF-F50E-49CB-A012-CC4EDA06E720"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/k4KLKtPBCwpf1lyOfcDy3-qJ4cA>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>, Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 05:26:47 -0000

Hi,

On 2016-04-11, at 16:46, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote:
> The main question now is this: this work started a long time ago (the first
> version is from Dec 20, 2014), and after a lot of work and discussion, the
> draft has already passed the Working Group Last Call, and the IRSG review.

you of course mean research group last call :-)

> So at this stage we cannot include modifications substantially modifying it.

Well, you can modify it, but it would imply re-running the last call and IRSG Review. It is a judgment call for the RG chairs whether they believe that a major revision would result in a document that is so much better that it is worth incurring the extra delay until publication.

Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email