Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com> Mon, 11 April 2016 09:58 UTC

Return-Path: <mmitar@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: gaia@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6712712EAB5 for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RvC86Ov7l_RP for <gaia@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x231.google.com (mail-io0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FEC112EAB3 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o126so179661859iod.0 for <gaia@irtf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=SMvJaZt0hXhyEOhleFrUhotxHSje2IsNdiEI79OANYU=; b=ELnQbjSaPOSsiLBXWlU24xkmghik3fZVLrrh/bDYSqUh3PkZin3qhld6aVeclILtBP oV/8KYVyusAIO9HSbYik8gjUxeu9XykQeQJMcW0JWjinaEV+liLE2JiH8Z4upv1/6pEu jEZmbsPLmDjtCD2JNkV0/206octDz3L9eXCz6o0GySN1BhmqDkoX9W+Hzj9Ei1w4TbIr ZBwcbcHnrJsz3m3jl+7O4mZBLovgJ8sfJIC6ULCNA2U3lOzLqpPGjuys0XtRbF48sD03 FcmQQ+1icDwSukjB01Sdp+YRnXk6p9OVdb5M6hdJMP7qMZMq6pH8aOpVOP0E4A+1Ayj/ Uhog==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=SMvJaZt0hXhyEOhleFrUhotxHSje2IsNdiEI79OANYU=; b=PzLibIiwS81YdQ1AuKJq75W5VSlQ+taWyQuNu5nMCUs4AiM/Hqa0jsGIaAiA8pxPEZ PFnhYrXIPGj6Ki+qUIUAxwwcrdMMX2OoDbdvq2qnNX3WjX/xtT0drBhjBlsmoYY00YTU ucQ2VjnzwadTh4jpX8aP1vLMr+b4JrleFKRVgZ4rCPPcWeHjViNIeDoMVCMQ9X3ZGyqD sYDhSzt/48ujSmsn//73dyBHBJKpqlc39epJLrBnlzXKjhSM4zZPas0y79IQclDE49ZH hScqlOQIf68/SiizWqH2FeAVupqCY3hl+lQPnZMyU1nas9PYC1c6//7vhLSgWT2Uz+lE oD6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLW22szJbnQN6ma2tx6dESSEKYoBu3tqktm10b/C1eFD6xr+3aKliJcf26+e7kWynYj2tqQLv73BI/EcA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.134.8 with SMTP id i8mr21454040iod.130.1460368704838; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.13.76 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAPaG1Ak-0wReP4E_Yxd1eEdDB28wex9JEMBuchxthrze8JMamw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKLmikPYuSrE69e5neDxOu+5+aUUJm_=vknaZxx3yBsWzfBHvw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPaG1Ak-0wReP4E_Yxd1eEdDB28wex9JEMBuchxthrze8JMamw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 02:58:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKLmikPazEYkPFjX+uVOUU5ocXeuE-no96mz=59fO3m5mmVEjw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mitar <mmitar@gmail.com>
To: Arjuna Sathiaseelan <arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gaia/qNXCAsG9DSK9BU8JoE6-GU882M0>
Cc: gaia <gaia@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments
X-BeenThere: gaia@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Global Access to the Internet for All <gaia.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/gaia/>
List-Post: <mailto:gaia@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia>, <mailto:gaia-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:58:27 -0000

Hi!

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Arjuna Sathiaseelan
<arjuna.sathiaseelan@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> this eg is already in the draft.
>
> I think most of the reasoning you have given should already be in the
> draft..

Not sure to which part of my e-mail does this relate to? Which
reasoning exactly? The things I wrote are things I feel are not in the
draft, or are not correctly represented in the draft.


Mitar

-- 
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m