Re: [gaia] Comments on: draft-irtf-gaia-alternative-network-deployments

+1

On 04/12/2016 02:31 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/04/16 21:52, Arjuna Sathiaseelan wrote:
>> I am sorry - but the document has been floating around for 2 years now -
>> and just passed IRSG review process..
> 
> Well yes the latter half of that sentence is correct, but
> IRSG review is not an examination and "floating around"
> (while accurate) is also perhaps not the best method for
> arriving at the best content.
> 
> While I do think this draft could be published as an RFC now
> with no harm accruing, my personal prediction is that all
> involved will end up happier in the longer term if we do
> try to discuss recent comments, which are not insubstantial
> (but which are also not showstoppers). I reckon that's true
> even if it's also for sure annoying for those who've been
> working on this text a while.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gaia mailing list
> gaia@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/gaia
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9