Re: [hrpc] new title for draft-tenoever-hrpc-political

Mark Perkins <marknoumea@yahoo.com> Thu, 19 July 2018 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <marknoumea@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F2F130E34 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BDYT9WOA9gxV for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic315-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic315-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.134.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96EB9130DD2 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1532042360; bh=bVArdWS2jrKebrDbnrtd3goDcLOj+UuzHsoBJOX+CqM=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=AbO8CKe8ubcMkH3NcKL6u+53Ae8oVlEf0rrKMQurBcuvHnFwFs7HlrDgd7utxLbmBEj5EJe8/Dl5M58r03h7b1Rhl6TD2/01uc/4qo1EqyMPefP1aWOu64Vco9ZW/ZqjYzap2d44bVL1KCW7ZXRd4w+j2T+Sp3rLC/fgJoBxZ3PlK6XQTne+fJ+ZqKLOWtWm2os9h5SnAjwC+zrrfQfo14tG9jgwLPfPw53i9c2r6Y1EfUJWfCEWLVIqJOFdzuHY7BQN9SmdhOcpc4DyLGwNHFk1Jrs3w/tt3db1KRQDsyz8D2RkIrJYzLtgtJ9DbRA+YmU0kW4QvNdvTQjO7VcW4A==
X-YMail-OSG: rYC99noVM1l4UbpxoD_QVL9C0OYBZ4uLbRQANUksHRI3u5Rt8BU0u91Fnr0rx0m zCSS6ZGquQGGiC0p_MMsgai2QCTffg2d89o2858LvJPFoFJoS3uYP6smr8Aj31LlpcLUmeEkMi9s 4o9lYLLuUUhbk2xe1fuN0d8F6qPIISsuufMj3R.lEGi92YKA1.JQdREnY1pEbmjVjBVW0GFDHD1l p6vzM4bxhlPb4SDUpNxMhDeir3ilNSgX4vJY8ROysxDeJk.bVA_GdZyD65AxFCQVWvzPE99iDiEH X9BHE.5Ta6HhuWyqskxwBE4vH92YntRbtrTm.3CZYBaa1SF9pb5uDzG8QqajGpiEyblTSPy8ySfi 8NzSQ4sAlUyM1y43fbHQ4mkGT_2YGPYXTY3IdYQnvK.yjsEJwn0PUFIJo5.oOKdXPSO4q_C_2PS_ NmD8VFRSvErx1yP.UjVnr8e5.YI2oregg9X_VQ8rRH8M1S8aQi7v9tY.9vh2yk_XGqayX0Y2iLTS XP6iSEk68bxkOZG_EhiHUbBtbUhfh5wlR6bkcsjsF1J.eTuks8fD0r63Z5BzD3aNjsIEuqqYt0__ q45DDe3ujLvUeO6DLMIjV8.mkxWpsBYxF7XzPUX0fteNkelerKkRZtu0JIeAVCH8BCxzO9yj1hJs 5g3gv8YStT8Pea_orPpk8SSYGqxxOvUUewhwlXmX76odf85BlFHi2PdNUxNup_PERX8ioW7X8huT u1eeYrMGCLHdUY7LXwoo1ykmT0IuOYOHf98YnNvUpylgdZPu2j2kyN8WqTaibAulIlItbB_k0cUY vsz7.dFbbfde4J91mBLlZmIUZzKe5pb_CYD_iGAjYc_xlTGN6sce3gMontKbJYxy3u1kww2Z52E1 1EmAXoTfXODCkWZSYI9a.RMX00dnVEMMVO74rwichjVW2juu4AtOtejBqwNUqbW35Dg0xVUK_L1_ 40g.MKkzrwROW9X7vAt5xz9ZxoKzkWg--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic315.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:19:20 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:19:15 +0000
From: Mark Perkins <marknoumea@yahoo.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
Message-ID: <391557389.6941958.1532042355138@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <465f6821-8fd3-c6c1-c4af-bf77ca892421@nielstenoever.net>
References: <8bc79f07-2eb8-bbb7-d3ff-23a10128f957@nielstenoever.net> <0cd24636-22df-d67e-5f3a-4e0de3b5e9a9@cs.tcd.ie> <db3d4143-85a2-76b0-cf41-b61d6f1dfca1@nielstenoever.net> <465f6821-8fd3-c6c1-c4af-bf77ca892421@nielstenoever.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_6941957_772305084.1532042355136"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.12062 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:61.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/61.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/gLlUfpr5PPYfIJoqH_GmjlXm860>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] new title for draft-tenoever-hrpc-political
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 23:19:24 -0000

 'Notes on networking standards and politics'
get my vote!
Mark Perkins

    On Friday, July 20, 2018, 10:10:27 AM GMT+11, Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net> wrote:  
 
 Off-list discussion with Stephen resulted in a new option:

'Notes on networking standards and politics'

That gives us a few options:

a) Notes on networking standards and politics
b) On Value Neutrality and the Politics of Standards
c) Notes on Value Neutrality and the Politics of Standards
d) ?

Curious to hear what the RG thinks sounds best, new suggestions ofc also
welcome.

Best,

Niels

On 07/20/2018 12:43 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/20/2018 12:38 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> Hiya,
>>
>> On 19/07/18 23:33, Niels ten Oever wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Thank you all very much for the spirited discussion at the session. To
>>> resolve the issue with draft political and remove the last issue mention
>>> blocking adoption I would like to propose to rename the draft:
>>>
>>> On Value Neutrality and the Politics of Standards
>>
>> Meh:-)
>>
>> How'd something more like "Some background on networking standards
>> and politics" work? That seems to describe the content of the draft
>> better to me, (modulo not having carefully read the latest rev, as I
>> admitted at the mic, so don't take me too seriously.)
>>
>> My reason for suggesting that is to try end up with something that
>> would be less surprising for an IETF (or IEEE 802 or W3C...) reader.
>>
> 
> Exactly that audience is saying time and again that 'technology is
> neutral' / 'protocols are neutral' / 'standards are neutral'. That is I
> would like to address that in the title (and the draft).
> 
> Following work can then address how we could come up with approaches to
> address that.
> 
> 
>> Cheers,
>> S.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Would that work for you all? I also added a few mentions of value
>>> neutrality (and the lack thereof) for consistency in the abstract,
>>> introduction, conclusion and the way forward.
>>>
>>> Changes can be seen here:
>>> https://github.com/nllz/IRTF-HRPC/commit/03826cd73959e692bb1f7aa305f9fbdee325dbd2#diff-fb9d617868a367dd946ef225cc5e6de1
>>>
>>> Happy to discuss.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Niels
>>>
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Researcher and PhD Candidate
Datactive Research Group
University of Amsterdam

PGP fingerprint      2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
                  643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
_______________________________________________
hrpc mailing list
hrpc@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc