Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

"Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com> Thu, 15 April 2010 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <annevk@opera.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92A428C1BE for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MZAj8TzCy3XB for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:07:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.opera.com (smtp.opera.com [213.236.208.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A36928C0F5 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 06:07:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from annevk-t60 (nttkyo234243.tkyo.nt.adsl.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp [222.159.9.243]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.opera.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o3FD7VQI026736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:07:40 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
To: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <3d5f2a811003150230sdeb4f78hbdece96e5c742cfc@mail.gmail.com> <de17d48e1003180316w3dda1a3fo7db8b357925ec3f8@mail.gmail.com> <p2o3d5f2a811003310031x5dce7e9cs86a5a8981cd23c1d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com> <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 22:07:30 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Organization: Opera Software ASA
Message-ID: <op.va7f2sgx64w2qv@annevk-t60>
In-Reply-To: <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.52 (Linux)
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:07:57 -0000

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:34:01 +0900, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> Aggregating multiple things into one email can be good, but aggregating  
> *everything* that was collected over several weeks into a single mail  
> clearly is not.

I find it useful.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/