IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com> Thu, 15 April 2010 09:44 UTC

Return-Path: <pieterh@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6823A6B6C for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fhhaCLt7qMhe for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466593A6B61 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvf33 with SMTP id 33so655222pvf.31 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=VYthZHLoCaX02D5CeChcvH4OvB44dZkB6PcdW2BCTfY=; b=KbBP/XIH7qnlmRS67boslykKTcZMPJihyKrO/zG7ZIymWQXiWeysHaKymyrd/VuaWm X0wlLOA8yKPGYRoIwuo0HheTJTXSzzEnb3dEzmKsU5ogSK8XgdYW3Gfj+f5g/Jwh4/Pm motQ3uwj3RY5cNocuYpbhzmdzEqCzbpMgRZJ0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=FjZCoikhFwRheb78FbzbPrkr2djig8ENDNOaVkGz71j3h4CawExZ3EL6evCQh7R1OC Zl4ewSJ6k8CNU/NyejR9QarDD48dEVr9SkDfqU3RRGTSizL9kh4Pm3SwVHryWihaUDRH Bzzij2qedDR43TPdLbsJvvqclC2USjFx4Kf/c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: pieterh@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.225.18 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <3d5f2a811003150230sdeb4f78hbdece96e5c742cfc@mail.gmail.com> <de17d48e1003180316w3dda1a3fo7db8b357925ec3f8@mail.gmail.com> <p2o3d5f2a811003310031x5dce7e9cs86a5a8981cd23c1d@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com> <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de>
From: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 11:44:21 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6aa85b646e9b269e
Received: by 10.140.55.5 with SMTP id d5mr1366126rva.47.1271324681438; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <r2x5821ea241004150244ud3cb79bt757049890bf3d9ab@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:44:53 -0000

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> On 15.04.2010 08:23, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
>>
>> tl;dr
>> ...
>
> Not helpful; both you quoting all of this and adding a single comment (as
> far as I can tell), and the original mega mail as well.

Sorry for top-quoting, that was lazy of me.  I started to parse Ian's
email but by page 5 or so, had to give up.

Ian, I think this has been said before, and I don't recall anyone ever
asking for your batch responses... nor have I ever seen this on any
other list.  Posting such mega emails is a guaranteed way to not get
responses.  How to even discuss?  You are in effect (re)launching 100+
threads in parallel.

As Julian says, please just respond like everyone else to emails on a
topic-per-topic basis.

-Pieter

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email