Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

[Greg Wilkins <[e-mail]>]

Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 16.04.2010 09:23, Greg Wilkins wrote:
>> ...
>> Actually, my real preference is that we get started
>> using trac to focus on individual issues and nail
>> them down 1 by 1 to get a good statement of requirements.
>> Without that, I think we will never converge on
>> consensus, regardless of how we thread our emails.
>> ...
> 
> My experience is that abusing a issue tracker for *discussion* is a
> terrible thing. (Been there in several WGs, and it didn't work well)
> 
> If you use it as *replacement* for email discussion than I *think* we'll
> have to set Trac up so that every change generates an email notification
> to this list.


Sorry, I didn't mean for the discussions to be conducted in trac.
Rather that the points of contention be identified in trac, and
the our discussion on the list could be more focused.

Currently they are very wide ranging from the future of application
development to the efficiency of bit packing integer encodings.

regards