Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback

Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> Fri, 16 April 2010 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ian@hixie.ch>
X-Original-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CA33A6B86 for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.773
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.826, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bez45jyec-nF for <hybi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from looneymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0323A6A26 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ps20323.dreamhostps.com (ps20323.dreamhost.com [69.163.222.251]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by looneymail-a2.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754A116D42D; Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:39:29 +0000
From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
To: Pieter Hintjens <ph@imatix.com>
In-Reply-To: <g2i5821ea241004160934q6245e6bej61ec36bf69b51d91@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004162013180.751@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
References: <B578CFED7FE85644A170F4F7C9D52692019544C5@ESESSCMS0361.eemea.ericsson.se> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004140032040.875@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <w2y5821ea241004142323h949c0b07l771171500a625a6c@mail.gmail.com> <4BC6DD89.4060502@gmx.de> <r2x5821ea241004150244ud3cb79bt757049890bf3d9ab@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004151908320.23507@ps20323.dreamhostps.com> <4BC76724.5090307@gmx.de> <4BC8105F.5000006@webtide.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20100416011832.095e31e8@resistor.net> <z2t8963eb921004160914w1ec4c7ebqdc4c585c346a0797@mail.gmail.com> <g2i5821ea241004160934q6245e6bej61ec36bf69b51d91@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-GB-hixie
Content-Style-Type: text/css
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: Hybi <hybi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [hybi] email granularity, was: WebSockets feedback
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 20:39:38 -0000

On Fri, 16 Apr 2010, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
> 
> Ian, do you accept that answering a specific question many weeks later, 
> in the middle of a hundred other questions, is akin to putting the reply 
> on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused 
> lavatory with a sign on the door saying 'Beware of the Leopard'...?

That certainly hasn't been my experience in the WHATWG. On the contrary, 
in fact; the way things have ended up working in the WHATWG is that a 
bunch of people state their requirements and provide relevant data, then 
in due course I wrap all the e-mails on a particular section of the spec 
into one e-mail and go through taking into account all the arguments, 
requirements, and data into account, making any needed changes to the 
spec, and then anyone interested in the topic replies to the relevant 
parts of the e-mail if they have new arguments or data to present, or to 
clarify misunderstandings or point out any errors I made.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'