Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket

"Arman Djusupov" <arman@noemax.com> Wed, 22 May 2013 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <SRS0+1ae53a578e5209af=PH=noemax.com=arman@noemax.com>
X-Original-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hybi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310D421F8FE8 for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 06:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E+OwxgHVOpeu for <hybi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 06:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.noemax.com (mail.noemax.com [74.208.113.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB9421F8529 for <hybi@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 06:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; t=1369229371; x=1369834171; s=m2048; d=noemax.com; c=relaxed/relaxed; v=1; bh=doPMA3VSQOM4Rvb7xdMGH9zJ8qg=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References; b=A5zBuz+EHr1MPwrakeZlhmDuXhuIYU+rFdQhMh1GTJcyFtKfBbawXFYxA1K06F4DWEqDF2su1SGMPGwc09+cFmKp7lShLk04d2lFvGncuZAgiP5WiSBiEOn+9ccET4UNCBUqJnt2A0rGjO/sHdHQf0Vd94U6348s5uYmmgfa5iK+6AknfGPpVb7g4oitqH0tUs6TlUf5U0og8VtwZqSf5atGdPtHeDkxaqSH4ZWfoCnDp+VJGpGXG6MARpw3EPKkruSJwixkRlwMo9ViZAhvjBi6brjU/zpFshtH4hFdd+MLSDfYP/ML2ZUuqkRBPqdkRO7skplPXbAwl0qLCFkHsw==
Received: from mail.noemax.com by mail.noemax.com (Noemax Mail Server) with ASMTP (SSL) id 201305221629301123; Wed, 22 May 2013 16:29:30 +0300
From: "Arman Djusupov" <arman@noemax.com>
To: "'Takeshi Yoshino'" <tyoshino@google.com>, <hybi@ietf.org>
References: <CAH9hSJZxr+aG7GZa4f-dUOTGj4bnJ+3XxivUX4jei5CMyqN4LQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZUG1f+3Uk=t2=A5i4O9=wPvAisspM=pgmGEH9emTL9-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH9hSJZai_UuxW4O6mZcEJT2DJoURtLo16XNci1qkYVWv4HVdg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH9hSJZai_UuxW4O6mZcEJT2DJoURtLo16XNci1qkYVWv4HVdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:29:33 +0300
Message-ID: <007501ce56f0$67f74080$37e5c180$@noemax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0076_01CE5709.8D44EDB0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGJbPE/yAcYUaa2Hw/8qx+KPIY2GAJfnsrjAhgTLgGZd0jZEA==
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket
X-BeenThere: hybi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Server-Initiated HTTP <hybi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hybi>
List-Post: <mailto:hybi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hybi>, <mailto:hybi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 13:52:13 -0000

Sorry, just realized that my message was sent to Takeshi privately by
mistake a few days ago.. (wrong button). It was actually intended for the
list so I am repeating it publicly now:

 

 

Obviously continuing to develop a hybi-mux spec for another year or two
doesn't make sense. Taking into account that new specifications are coming
and that HTTP2.0 will probably provide multiplexing for both WebSocket and
HTTP traffic, at  this stage it would only be worth investing development
time in a "simple and ready to go" hybi-mux specification. Maybe if we
simplify the spec to rock bottom simplicity, even sacrificing some features
so that we can conclude it very fast, then maybe vendors might pick it up.
This way we will give to WebSocket its own mux for now, while the HTTPbis
draft might take much longer to form into the final specification. In any
case, hybi-mux must be reviewed and finalized in a very short time, plus it
should be simpler and easier to implement than both SDPY and HTTPbis based
multiplexing.

 

With best regards,

Arman

 

From: hybi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hybi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Takeshi Yoshino
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2013 7:31 AM
To: hybi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [hybi] Call for interest: multiplexing dedicated for WebSocket

 

I got one comment about this.

 

He/she suggested that we finish the WebSocket dedicated multiplexing quickly
even by simplifying the spec much e.g. cutting some functionality in it that
would take much time to get consensus, and when HTTP/2.0 is matured, switch
to that.