[I18ndir] Review volunteer needed (Fwd: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07)

[Pete Resnick <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

DISPATCH has made a working group last call on 
draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs. Given how much i18n content there 
is, the ADs and chairs agreed that an early review wouldn't hurt. There 
is a bunch of text about formal programming languages in this draft, so 
I didn't want to just stick somebody with it. Anyone feel comfortable 
enough to take on a review?

Note that the review itself is much less horrible than it seems. This is 
really a -bis draft of RFC 4329, and most of the i18n language in here 
is unchanged from 4329. See:

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=rfc4329&url2=draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07

So it's really just reviewing any changes, and making sure that nothing 
absolutely egregious was in 4329 itself.

Thanks,

pr

Forwarded message:

> From: Ben Campbell <[e-mail]>
> To: DISPATCH WG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: dispatch chairs <[e-mail]>, ART ADs 
> <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
> Subject: [dispatch] WGLC of draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07
> Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 14:24:47 -0500
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a repeat working group last call of 
> draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs-07.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs/
>
> The new version has changed quite a bit due to feedback from the first 
> WGLC, shepherd feedback, and feedback from others. In particular, this 
> version obsoletes RFC 4329, rather than updating as did the version 
> from the first WGLC.
>
> This WGLC will end on 8 May 20202. Please send feedback to the 
> DISPATCH list and the authors. And if you review the document and 
> think it’s ready to go, please say so.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben