IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [idn] Re: process

James Seng <james@seng.cc> Fri, 25 February 2005 17:36 UTC

Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11366 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 12:36:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D4jLI-0003MI-RT for idn-data@psg.com; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:33:32 +0000
Received: from [61.215.206.254] (helo=vbn.inter-touch.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D4jLH-0003Lt-S2 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:33:32 +0000
Received: from [219.101.164.151] (unknown [219.101.164.151]) by vbn.inter-touch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E08409484; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 02:33:27 +0900 (JST)
In-Reply-To: <421F5CFA.5020903@vanderpoel.org>
References: <D872CCF059514053ECF8A198@scan.jck.com> <421D8411.9030006@vanderpoel.org> <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com> <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org> <00a401c51af3$7863aae0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> <20050225113725.GA8820@nic.fr> <421F482B.1060909@vanderpoel.org> <2b4b22d85b2872558414c64071e7b993@seng.cc> <421F5CFA.5020903@vanderpoel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <f0ed7f8a3f070ef490cfad154fae93ff@seng.cc>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: idn@ops.ietf.org, Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>, Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
From: James Seng <james@seng.cc>
Subject: Re: [idn] Re: process
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 01:33:30 +0800
To: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Erik,

> That's a pretty cavalier attitude for someone who used to be co-chair 
> of an IETF Working Group.

Please focus on my logic of my explanation instead of paying attention 
to who I am or who I was. Whats wrong with my explanation?

> Maybe I should write an Informational RFC titled "IDN Considered 
> Harmful". Would that catch your attention?

You should write what you think, and stop writing what will catch my 
(or others) attention. Perhaps that would be most constructive for all.

> PS Re: RFC 3490 Security Considerations, please tell me exactly where 
> punctuation is specifically mentioned.

I said it was discussed in the wg before. Lots of the discussion wasn't 
recorded into the RFC. Please go thru the archive and you find at least 
2 threads discussing it. Its 2:32am for me now so I am heading to bed 
so sorry I cant post any URLs you right now.

-James Seng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email