IETF Logo Mail Archive

[idn] Mozilla?

"JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com> Sun, 27 February 2005 04:36 UTC

Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA26351 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:36:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D5G2q-0000G5-1Y for idn-data@psg.com; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:28:40 +0000
Received: from [63.247.74.122] (helo=montage.altserver.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D5G2n-0000Ff-T5 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:28:38 +0000
Received: from if12m4-235.d2.club-internet.fr ([212.195.66.235] helo=jfc.afrac.org) by montage.altserver.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.44) id 1D5G2m-0001jA-EM for idn@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:28:36 -0800
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20050227050824.03d100c0@mail.jefsey.com>
X-Sender: jefsey+jefsey.com@mail.jefsey.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:13:54 +0100
To: idn@ops.ietf.org
From: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@jefsey.com>
Subject: [idn] Mozilla?
In-Reply-To: <20050226081913.GD14956~@nicemice.net>
References: <D872CCF059514053ECF8A198@scan.jck.com> <421D8411.9030006@vanderpoel.org> <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com> <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org> <00a401c51af3$7863aae0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> <20050226081913.GD14956~@nicemice.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - montage.altserver.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ops.ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - jefsey.com
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/1754.html
Will people not associate IDN now with phishing.
In a way it seems worst than saying we block IDNs?
jfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email