Re: [idn] something a little lighter for the weekend

"Doug Ewell" <dewell@adelphia.net> Mon, 28 February 2005 16:31 UTC

Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA06344 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:31:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D5nhJ-000NtM-SH for idn-data@psg.com; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:24:41 +0000
Received: from [68.168.78.202] (helo=mta10.adelphia.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D5nhI-000NsU-10 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:24:40 +0000
Received: from DEWELL ([68.66.2.217]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050228162438.THJ6134.mta10.adelphia.net@DEWELL> for <idn@ops.ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:24:38 -0500
Message-ID: <003101c51db1$d8a16580$030aa8c0@DEWELL>
From: Doug Ewell <dewell@adelphia.net>
To: IETF idn working group <idn@ops.ietf.org>
References: <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com> <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org> <00a401c51af3$7863aae0$030aa8c0@DEWELL> <20050226081913.GD14956~@nicemice.net> <4220D1C4.7000909@vanderpoel.org> <20050228015545.GA23896~@nicemice.net>
Subject: Re: [idn] something a little lighter for the weekend
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:23:31 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Adam M. Costello <idn dot amc plus 0 at nicemice dot net dot
RemoveThisWord> wrote:

> According to the Unicode standard, there are 52 scripts.

There may be 52 scripts currently encoded in Unicode, but I am sure
Unicode does not claim that is the total number of scripts in the world.
Others can and will be encoded.

-Doug Ewell
 Fullerton, California
 http://users.adelphia.net/~dewell/