IETF Logo Mail Archive

[idn] process

Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org> Fri, 25 February 2005 03:57 UTC

Received: from psg.com (mailnull@psg.com [147.28.0.62]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA29842 for <idn-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:57:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D4WVy-000KOx-7t for idn-data@psg.com; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:51:42 +0000
Received: from [207.115.63.77] (helo=pimout1-ext.prodigy.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.44 (FreeBSD)) id 1D4WVx-000KOi-75 for idn@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:51:41 +0000
Received: from [10.1.1.2] (adsl-64-174-147-206.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.174.147.206]) by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1P3pcSJ326524; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:51:38 -0500
Message-ID: <421EA0C9.1010500@vanderpoel.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:51:37 -0800
From: Erik van der Poel <erik@vanderpoel.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: idn@ops.ietf.org
Subject: [idn] process
References: <421B8484.3070802@vanderpoel.org> <20050223072837.GA21463~@nicemice.net> <D872CCF059514053ECF8A198@scan.jck.com> <421D8411.9030006@vanderpoel.org> <p06210208be4390618c81@[192.168.0.101]> <421E0D0C.2000309@vanderpoel.org> <p06210202be43c3888991@[192.168.0.101]> <E07CE813AD23B2D95DA0C740@scan.jck.com> <421E30F2.1040408@vanderpoel.org> <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E7F74C71945B923C52211F3@scan.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on psg.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1
Sender: owner-idn@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All,

1. Is this the right time to start working on Internet Drafts leading up 
to new version(s) of the IDNA RFC(s)? If not, when?

2. Am I stepping on someone's toes by creating nameprep.org? Feel free 
to respond publicly or privately.

3. If this is the right time to start work on drafts, who would like to 
write some prose?

4. Do we need to revive the IDN WG?

5. Any other process questions?

Thanks,

Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email