IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Part 2 of CAR/CT Adoption call (7/6 to 7/20) - Adoption of draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-05.txt and draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-17.txt

"苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com> Sat, 16 July 2022 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF6EC159496 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 05:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X5qddX0SbtjF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out0-138.mail.aliyun.com (out0-138.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.138]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92746C15948D for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Jul 2022 05:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1657975424; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=Gu+gK7cArInNityeY5w40zQX9WUlWUzMq3MGYOz2Gto=; b=vt+lcbP4WW+4arqqFOFliPTrENhAJMhNScoIn7uTrH54WKGhpDOoLsApuTCVL+kZ7Jebu2zaU2VU2F82Tq6UiLOHihRsUJPzolAza7O/f7UOAQXDmjCBoP/gd2ZZiRCA9P5CDs7HWWukf3LMSnqHABd3CbW4l/UXTrsSMZ/+dFE=
X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R141e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=ay29a033018047192; MF=yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DW; RN=1; SR=0; TI=W4_0.1.30_v5ForWebDing_21254281_1657974871507_o7001c119u;
Received: from WS-web (yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com[W4_0.1.30_v5ForWebDing_21254281_1657974871507_o7001c119u]) at Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:43:43 +0800
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 20:43:43 +0800
From: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
To: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Reply-To: "苏远超(以泰)" <yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
Message-ID: <868066fa-71ff-4bde-b001-7364624c3603.yitai.syc@alibaba-inc.com>
X-Mailer: [Alimail-Mailagent revision 7410][W4_0.1.30][v5ForWebDing][Chrome]
MIME-Version: 1.0
x-aliyun-mail-creator: W4_0.1.30_v5ForWebDing_M3LTW96aWxsYS81LjAgKE1hY2ludG9zaDsgSW50ZWwgTWFjIE9TIFggMTBfMTVfNSkgQXBwbGVXZWJLaXQvNTM3LjM2IChLSFRNTCwgbGlrZSBHZWNrbykgQ2hyb21lLzgxLjAuNDA0NC4xMzggU2FmYXJpLzUzNy4zNg==vN
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=ALIBOUNDARY_85688_7eff205fd700_62d2b27f_1309ac"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CDs1ERkPMHjt1veU1YVuwROc7vY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Part 2 of CAR/CT Adoption call (7/6 to 7/20) - Adoption of draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-05.txt and draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-17.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2022 12:44:30 -0000

Dear WG,
 As co-author, I support the adoption of BGP-CAR.
 We've been deploying <E,C> SR Policy model, and is extending this model to support per prefix multiple colors(intent), so a mechanism which is totally compliant with use of the Color ExtComm for automated steering of services with SR Policy is a must, as we don't expect a folk-lift solution.
  Thanks!

  Yuanchao Su
  Director, Alibaba Cloud Network Architecture

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email