IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Part 2 of CAR/CT Adoption call (7/6 to 7/20) - Adoption of draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-05.txt and draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-17.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Mon, 18 July 2022 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13379C15A726 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y45AP7FMKB8N for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x136.google.com (mail-lf1-x136.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::136]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E59DC159488 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x136.google.com with SMTP id d12so19357188lfq.12 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eOvf3eZ8uAT3o1PstOCAnwyZNYtEQf5UzC2ltA8poVM=; b=RLnnTET8Qtu8PmlGng+bqk/1O+16z6d+gyL7FNa/hOZLNAcJG2X593xvUJgQDb01xQ CwbLllHiBc3tWjji9SYFwyo32jdGpYXR06RpwRSXi9K/f69BD28ScPjuwMTvG9Tsjp7h HNi0vvIkZkc7Ep/xi6JNC1YZeagZ600X68+b1OO+6Ja/JiAk2RV6A5+sQKyoWcv57FiE xMXf2SP5ksTZFrl+dOs158JGblIrM5zNUvTAuHU8GLsXEkGlwqnHpeIBxYaXbUB1dBcV +hY3gGAAkGh8KIhKdoNppBu9S52S4OY9tjkqE5ImYh4U3sDYEStNvznlitrQiFQLZKBz wgvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eOvf3eZ8uAT3o1PstOCAnwyZNYtEQf5UzC2ltA8poVM=; b=z8LaH1vImA0vFkuduJCj6qpUjomdW7WqQm2XrZWUfvFZPvEKWQOAq6jrGnAIenMdlQ cHf7lkf4MneVMl1n4qb4O6Lf+vreTDiLp5KspiiKUz5OLAnQ4/1lcuxq7HxoCHifjUqU SvSsEbKx0CwWYvajCcBDuaEBIrrwM9gzjpPyeZQR1DVGqp9ar9h7uwsDeTZfCR5w4ons dCPfHFilfV8A/3Iweqt/jib3UEOohvm7U1zvBVNLC6Z0xJzkRsukYX75hyJPVcng96mn mlDsBUXgO7wd1mT6jvTw0+NeWNrs8p3pbIlR+YwCoOlKJdj+0/kVc2qraySODpiWPRz+ zhYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+P9u16qzd2wASzsfwHAzLwNG8hzVD2ppMQxebNpuCqk7Xuof3b XFkbFlpSOJM46pnIAdhRf01g1BhGsMC3dazJDfA7y1pRTjA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vWnIRNDRtwXVRYxJU4oXjbdy24RFZDpPSnCfjstwXfzmNCXEnxuDTA0jUVZM3gPVVOWwAp4NaQ/nQpmXdbJ+8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:2204:b0:489:fd91:89ea with SMTP id h4-20020a056512220400b00489fd9189eamr15532874lfu.593.1658151754391; Mon, 18 Jul 2022 06:42:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <BYAPR08MB48725C453611F6A21F255295B3809@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <ZR0P278MB0060F22403FF63830C789A98F68C9@ZR0P278MB0060.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <ZR0P278MB006038CDD3EAF910F46B465CF68C9@ZR0P278MB0060.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <BYAPR08MB487234040124040821430DBBB38C9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR08MB487234040124040821430DBBB38C9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 15:42:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHn=Y-iR9LUPMP2B7T6W2fBg=9bViXbpCjC60-rBhqY3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: Julian Klaiber <julian.klaiber@ost.ch>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004df5bb05e4148af4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/glFE8fpCCgHNFXpA5hRYr1HtQrw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Part 2 of CAR/CT Adoption call (7/6 to 7/20) - Adoption of draft-dskc-bess-bgp-car-05.txt and draft-kaliraj-idr-bgp-classful-transport-planes-17.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 13:42:40 -0000

Hello Sue,

As I was not sure if I formally answered your questions I took a stub at
them. And pretty much failed at #1 ...


>    1. Do you agree or disagree that these two drafts are functionally
>    identical?
>
>
Thinking more .. I am not really sure what you are asking here.

Is OSPF and ISIS functionally identical ? Both give you a product of SPF
... but they do it in completely different ways.

or

Is a trip from Boston to New York by plane, by train or by car functionally
identical ? All of them will get you to the final destination - perhaps all
will even take roughly the same total time door to door - but how can we
say that are functionally identical or not ?

Many thx,
Robert



>
>    1. If you agree, should we have just one draft or do the operational
>    difference encourage us to have two drafts?
>    2. If you disagree, do the functional differences encourage us to have
>    one or two drafts adopted?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Susan Hares
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email