IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09 (2/28/2023 to 3/14/2023)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Wed, 08 March 2023 18:58 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127D4C1526E9 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:58:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yFxtNZgwGHK7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E71C1522A0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:58:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (104-10-90-238.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [104.10.90.238]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8972B1E037; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:58:15 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5085ba88-8af8-93d2-1fd4-e990a3abe9b9@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 13:58:15 -0500
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FF87C659-3DF4-4F5A-B8D2-995CF46676CC@pfrc.org>
References: <BYAPR08MB4872FD426205CAC6F82D22BEB3AD9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303070725390.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAOj+MMGUfxd1LLta9=_HU+uMKcbVVE6ijkG84-ST0LDo3m2MYQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303070953000.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAOj+MMF8gELjxXB=kmn3eTu8X96vP7ueOTSA6Q+V_086wfO=NQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303071107360.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <3caaea46-cc66-f084-ec9b-98783d6daa49@foobar.org> <CAOj+MME=-drWX_1=9T8jqBGvEfwB59PmjLoh65i8wvdppKFKYg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303071224040.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAOj+MMFc29DOAL6QK3u9gzPBQPv3wRdhTRHRPD_1ABebtuX0=w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303071246590.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <DB2B7372-D021-4E86-AF83-C6A55EF72D75@pfrc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303081108250.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9505159A-F31F-4C1C-84BB-C9A2E7E46ED4@pfrc.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303081757460.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <8B30B017-295F-4D4E-B8EA-FF0E15471F47@pfrc.org> <5085ba88-8af8-93d2-1fd4-e990a3abe9b9@foobar.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/RqRFwZto5QlwVk3YeY9niCqwokg>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09 (2/28/2023 to 3/14/2023)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2023 18:58:18 -0000


> On Mar 8, 2023, at 1:41 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Jeffrey Haas wrote on 08/03/2023 18:35:
>> Does that solve the entirety of this problem?  No.  And that no is
>> why I'm not presenting the timeout as "this is THE SOLUTION to the
>> problem".  At best, it's a useful tool in helping out.
> 
> for sure it's a workaround for implementation bugs, but zooming out, it helps in two separate ways: 1. resolving symptoms and 2. pointing the finger at the source of the breakage. Both these things are independently worthwhile.

Agreed.

Speaking as an individual contributor, I'd like to see the sendholdtimer work discuss its interactions with the tcp option for these reasons.  (And noted it in my comments on the draft in a separate thread.)

-- Jeff

> 
> Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email