Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09 (2/28/2023 to 3/14/2023)

[Gyan Mishra <[e-mail]>]

I support adoption of the send hold timer to help overcome situations with
stuck BGP peers TCP 0 window issue.

There has been a lot of discussion on this topic and thanks to the authors
we have a path forward to help overcome this problem.

I believe this change should update RFC 4271.


Thanks

Gyan

On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 9:49 PM Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
>
> draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09(2/28/2023 - 3/14/2023).
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer/
>
>
>
> The authors should send in an IPR statement.
>
>
>
> This draft modifies RFC 4271.
>
>
>
> The authors have this description of the draft
>
>
>
>   This document defines the SendHoldTimer session attribute for the
>
>    Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Finite State Machine (FSM).
>
>    Implementation of a SendHoldTimer should help overcome situations
>
>    where BGP sessions are not terminated after it has become detectable
>
>    for the local system that the remote system is not processing BGP
>
>    messages.  For robustness, this document specifies that the local
>
>    system should close BGP connections and not solely rely on the remote
>
>    system for session closure when BGP timers have expired.  This
>
>    document updates RFC4271.
>
>
>
> Please consider if this addition should be made to RFC 4271.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Sue
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email [e-mail] <[e-mail]>*



*M 301 502-1347*