IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09 (2/28/2023 to 3/14/2023)

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Tue, 07 March 2023 10:09 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813DEC151556 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:09:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKYC-gUYpBUG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:09:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C1EEC151538 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 02:09:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 56F5DB4; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:09:41 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1678183781; bh=8d3fGSUXSNpyjRcsPig5FuXY1NBTzkAiMKEaVuzYYOQ=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=YqoFiid/npH1icwhoFIEJm7PrRc7T6sJ9Y1fDfsHrhqSg9M7pK0cmPXe9GStpklJT 8r865NDpuut1SbvicdMXPjfsF5Zi1hg8CWTRI6i13BPmiCcQ4KLguatSGTjDWR2smr /mk0ibw2rnTpeo9JSV0yztIIba45wjFYgAGAUZ/g=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5293CB3; Tue, 7 Mar 2023 11:09:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 11:09:41 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
cc: idr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMF8gELjxXB=kmn3eTu8X96vP7ueOTSA6Q+V_086wfO=NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303071107360.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <BYAPR08MB4872FD426205CAC6F82D22BEB3AD9@BYAPR08MB4872.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <AM7PR07MB6248673BB25E0C0BCDBEE480A0B69@AM7PR07MB6248.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHF9G5-CmGPJpWja=1kgBrV=EYtzyhQr9La1722=D+ugA@mail.gmail.com> <m2edq1ac7s.wl-randy@psg.com> <ZAZSyywxxg0HkaDw@snel> <CAOj+MMGiB8iiqKbj40kZsSFAQXCQ+baGQWuA7oQ1D0qF5aygeQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303070725390.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAOj+MMGUfxd1LLta9=_HU+uMKcbVVE6ijkG84-ST0LDo3m2MYQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2303070953000.2636@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAOj+MMF8gELjxXB=kmn3eTu8X96vP7ueOTSA6Q+V_086wfO=NQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/dXSUhHThPeoapf1-O2aQMV6lwQ8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for draft-spaghetti-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer-09 (2/28/2023 to 3/14/2023)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 10:09:53 -0000

On Tue, 7 Mar 2023, Robert Raszuk wrote:

> But we discussed this ... If network is stable and you are only putting
> keepalives say every 60 sec it will be hours before the socket buffer get's
> filled and you get first notification about it to local BGP process.
>
> How is the solution presented in this draft helpful ?

Our network (which has had this happen to us) sends data all the time, and 
even if it takes hours it's still better than the alternative of not 
detecting it at all.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email