IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 11:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30CF3A6F27 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.657
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.657 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.942, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HR8qlIHohATD for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4733A6E67 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95Bm9AZ002689; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286279301; bh=bA3AlCupKTsY1LkPBMOV15bvdAA=; h=From:To:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=cQBz1wW5Jrp7OHOAM wTJp3DsadWAfvDcS92MT4UA25dhlbiz4wQv6CGwGe5k4ydjmDtDnoM+lDxqRKXtI2cF TtzsgqBwXECh+8bxdrEO5mVkZcoE21KZRnQDfnzgPPgbGNjkz6CYZ8uJZx1BpTCAvOZ NVZiu8XefP5FyAziTYvM=
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95Bm3rF002674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:08 -0700
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:48:02 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: "ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org" <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:48:00 -0700
Thread-Topic: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Thread-Index: ActkJx0Cv3eickJ5S8641Rp4cgVFoAAWRdQA
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1340BA36B3@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010041705480.14230@joyce.lan> <6446F073-FAA1-4B88-84C3-1EC73A0EB1F0@cybernothing.org> <B37E8D49-0714-4F0F-9567-DCE8C3A71F0F@cox.com>
In-Reply-To: <B37E8D49-0714-4F0F-9567-DCE8C3A71F0F@cox.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 04:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sbh17.songbird.com id o95Bm3rF002674
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org] On Behalf Of Bill.Oxley@cox.com
> Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 5:49 PM
> To: jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org
> Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
> 
> We are not holding up the dkim spec, we are wanting a datapoint to be
> kept in the draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

But:

a) It's technically out of scope, i.e. it's not a data point relevant to DKIM itself since RFC4871 doesn't say anything at all about a binding between "d=" and anything else in the message, so its removal would actually be justified; however

b) It was not actually removed from the draft, it was simply reworded to be more precise as suggested by one of the other participants[1].  It's right there on page 10, at least on the version I'm looking at on the IETF web site.

So are you saying you want the old wording back for some reason?  If not, I don't see what the complaint is.

It looks like I dropped the AOL version of the same statistic by mistake.  I'll add it back in after last call completes.

Gmail did not provide me with their version of that statistic.  Since it's of such interest, I'll ask for it, but I may not get it.

-MSK

[1] http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim/2010q4/014572.html


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email