IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

<Bill.Oxley@cox.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 04:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3103A6E05 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5125ueYaB7BE for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA3A3A6C7C for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o954nnCt006963; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:55 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286254200; bh=X46w3G/7/kQMwnMVdlnrLgF0qkA=; h=From:To:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=ld5CR/XkC5usMYsAD xUEtdpv7Se7kZRnx8Z602j9NaFpwLIhcBJMWccy2XN0OIbSCg23uTlmz8rAcrOaZDzN eIne1HGy5k8IaIWNx8qDIByURqalReNPQ7n582Wm/WWZUBSTsMlOvRDeBelz5pPwqoP nk3cafDEOWD3mV7j34E0=
Received: from cox.com (post6.cox.com [24.248.74.39]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o954nf0l006953 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 21:49:47 -0700
Received: from ([192.168.74.254]) by post6.cox.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503604.355728606; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:50:00 -0400
Received: from CATL0MS104.corp.cox.com ([169.254.1.246]) by CATL0MS401.corp.cox.com ([10.62.236.87]) with mapi; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:49:06 -0400
From: Bill.Oxley@cox.com
To: jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 20:49:06 -0400
Thread-Topic: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Thread-Index: ActkJx0Cv3eickJ5S8641Rp4cgVFoA==
Message-ID: <B37E8D49-0714-4F0F-9567-DCE8C3A71F0F@cox.com>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010041705480.14230@joyce.lan> <6446F073-FAA1-4B88-84C3-1EC73A0EB1F0@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <6446F073-FAA1-4B88-84C3-1EC73A0EB1F0@cybernothing.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: Delayed for 04:00:17 by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 21:49:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sbh17.songbird.com id o954nf0l006953
Cc: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

We are not holding up the dkim spec, we are wanting a datapoint to be kept in the draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
On Oct 4, 2010, at 7:40 PM, J.D. Falk wrote:

> On Oct 4, 2010, at 5:06 PM, John R. Levine wrote:
> 
>>> to Draft Standard.  Everyone please review it, and post
>>> comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
>>> it's ready to go.
>> 
>> I have reviewed it, and it looks ready to go.
> 
> +1
> 
> Regarding Hector's complaint, I think a separate usage report focused on 1st/3rd party signing practices may be appropriate -- but I don't think it makes sense to hold up the advancement of the DKIM base spec for that.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
> http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email