Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 651883A6CBE for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.677
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.922, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8i5mS8sYBKEP for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D1823A6C7A for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95F5Mpe018149; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:05:28 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286291129; bh=kotAmorXnkZXIf0uMyhO3dgi1mM=; h=From:To:Date: Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=VmbuDYl/Ca9qt5yuk 3Ny7iDMMg6lkphQuozwLQm1pv0a2jK18AzpuBvcy/g9SI+JLyDhdJ5n03Nzb3B5s7gJ Zfh9NUORmRYkMwzr3MM7ANqMyFdkySZq8Wl/2BME1v04iXY4MC8/z7OGg0hzMWnHgGv AL6zBIKJx6JnYv3Db9tw=
Received: from ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht1-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.35]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95F5F2S018127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:05:20 -0700
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by malice.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.71]) with mapi; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:05:15 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:05:14 -0700
Thread-Topic: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
Thread-Index: Actkmp0Ux3wIH5dPQ9e+qDH0t+HnswAA+zPQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1340BA36C5@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com> <4CAB279B.60307@sonnection.nl> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1340BA36BD@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <4CAB37C6.40500@sonnection.nl>
In-Reply-To: <4CAB37C6.40500@sonnection.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:05:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sbh17.songbird.com id o95F5F2S018127
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rolf E. Sonneveld [mailto:R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2010 7:36 AM
> To: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Cc: DKIM Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-
> implementation-report
> 
> Are we looking at the same report? I used
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report which
> brings me to version 02 of the document. I see [DKIM] mentioned here
> and
> there, throughout the document, but not in chapter 2? Or do you mean
> the
> page header, which mentions RFC4871 and of course presents the same
> referral as [DKIM] gives?

Sorry, you're right; the first [DKIM] reference is in Section 1.  For completeness, I'll add it to Section 2 as well.

> OK, then maybe that's something that needs to be mentioned, to explain
> why that part of the report is less exact than for example the data
> points about OpenDKIM and AOL.

Yep, that seems reasonable.  I'll do that as well.

-MSK

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html