IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Tue, 05 October 2010 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19AD3A6D42 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.257
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.257 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.342, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2t1Q1Lnabhqj for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD43A6CE5 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:55:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952t4HW002669; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:55:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286247311; bh=IC4yGpNES+fTml8oDoXjd7VTEs8=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:CC:References:In-Reply-To:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=WoS05HSQvs5EYMcLW GWVFaNQyJaWbKioZMWUSuMz4kv61/+qNNKVeTncdBefKlp3778qznNQU9gAFwsz1SNR YvfAt4gQAR+4SBtmwLAdMfpRXCSoA3ZyGdB77lZtUVmiAvF/NUouwl55watdqBnUlMd GQiykbJJ41HQyYtWim10=
Received: from mail.winserver.com (news.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o952sud0002657 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 19:55:01 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@isdg.net
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.5) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:54:01 -0400
Received: from opensite.winserver.com (beta.winserver.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.5) with ESMTP id 505083750; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:54:00 -0400
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.2) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:54:19 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([99.3.147.93]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.2) with ESMTP id 2540382031; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:54:18 -0400
Message-ID: <4CAA9362.1090001@isdg.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 22:54:26 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: DKIM List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1010041705480.14230@joyce.lan> <6446F073-FAA1-4B88-84C3-1EC73A0EB1F0@cybernothing.org> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1340BA36AA@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F1340BA36AA@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
X-Comment: Missing recipient address appended by wcSMTP router.
To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

> Actually the data are still there.  It was just reworded, as per Jeff's suggestion:
> 
>    Identities:  73.8% of the signatures observed included a "d=" value
>       matching the domain in the From: field.
> 
> ...so this is a non-issue.

Sure it is.  Was it 78.9% for all implementations?  AOL and GOOGLE, 
the 2006 Interoperability Event participants,  your OpenDKIM network 
of implementators?  Or was it just for AOL 78.9%

In fact, one can take a swag that google's data is 100% third party 
because it was there reception analysis - unless one suggest google 
allows others to sign as GMAIL to send to their servers?

Stop skewing DATA - its unethical. We might not be smart but we are 
not STUPID.

-- 
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email