IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

SM <sm@resistor.net> Tue, 05 October 2010 22:25 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416A3A6E15 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.703
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.703 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.896, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TR4DTaksG7D for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:25:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5BC3A6E81 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:25:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95MPXMB008949; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:25:40 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286317544; bh=/qbLD+LtKe9dL9v0b+AWNs3DNMo=; h=Message-Id:Date:To: From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=hct9uK165xQSGewnN coEIxAnIWjba3tZWTV84KXibqFdYZVbnXhwbe1UHQ3LeTqw1XeeUAFBpa8ZjDx5ctAO AuspYr3lNyzJYw0G8UGm7pl3MKdp9ZTW/TNFAXvfNClA5KX6OxjhM8W1rvUF4Or8RC0 Yif3G0Jbxd5SqRABruv8=
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95MPPN1008935 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:25:31 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@resistor.net
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.5.Alpha0/8.14.5.Alpha0) with ESMTP id o95LWhAS009023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 14:32:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20101005142023.0d12d748@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:22:46 -0700
To: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.c om>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:25:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: Delayed for 00:52:33 by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

At 13:41 04-10-10, Barry Leiba wrote:
>Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
>interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:

I read the implementation report for RFC 4871 
(draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02).  It addresses the 
comments I raised previously.

Regards,
-sm  

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email