[ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 04 October 2010 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E03A70AA for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.133, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iVJ1+kefwlEU for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448153A709A for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94Kfcf9023357; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286224906; bh=F0TvqcZ20g5rTULaZar1gWd6y/U=; h=MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:To:Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive: List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=Md4Av+z2a0VXldPqN3+kbVBP1FM+T6 wM1kfDXYq4VpWt8yVNLeMxxfogpsi05HiSeXyhjumEuYxWJeGYjSjIKNLC7uuyqJQu8 Rgq6O18mmdDfSZBN9+DnsHEhnBmgVPeT+0Kh8PyyqEt0E8Du4opwzf56FfvMsDDsuM+ DvavDw0=
Received: from mail-ew0-f50.google.com (mail-ew0-f50.google.com [209.85.215.50]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94KfUwS023351 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:35 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so2128985ewy.9 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.104.198 with SMTP id q6mr8531942fao.24.1286224889432; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.220.64.79 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:41:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NpbZQlfzvaEF_J4D5iwV2OD_kMI
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:41:36 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.

This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec
to Draft Standard.  Everyone please review it, and post
comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
it's ready to go.

Barry, as chair
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html