Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

Jeff Macdonald <macfisherman@gmail.com> Tue, 05 October 2010 19:22 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276FD3A7067 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.145
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.145 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.454, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sjbz3dCOce7H for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182243A6DA6 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95JL46V002277; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:21:10 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286306471; bh=NxJCAGmAFQUkpv7e71nDPd6yoUQ=; h=MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=X5giXadj+8jObrHhX PJAPw43H8VZ33mBqYrM63dMTBoMXo1zYui7j1iiCKrgbIUG0dYH1fTcrHF3cDZ2359u xNRu55MP+KQAeH8UPdoI2zEyK+h/q48cmWfOhXUw7ZK10pHRMf7ZcgFiu49rYTDCitq DVfJ+2PyaK+GAjXKN6dM=
Received: from mail-qy0-f178.google.com (mail-qy0-f178.google.com [209.85.216.178]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95JKwjx002264 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:21:03 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@gmail.com
Received: by qyk4 with SMTP id 4so3136qyk.9 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.78.40 with SMTP id i40mr8437629qak.340.1286306457340; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.223.212 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:20:57 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcC8P5y5-kOiyWo7z26h=cKtLyDJtE4KSoT83T@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeff Macdonald <macfisherman@gmail.com>
To: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by sbh17.songbird.com id o95JKwjx002264
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
> interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
>  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
> The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.
>
> This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec
> to Draft Standard.  Everyone please review it, and post
> comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
> it's ready to go.

I find sections 4.2 and 4.3 hard to compare. It could be just me. That
is just my quick observation.


-- 
Jeff Macdonald
Ayer, MA

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html