[ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics
Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Mon, 04 October 2010 22:02 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37103A6DB4 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.252
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.252 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.347, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uHGadIcLCDIG for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F63A6D8A for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:02:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94M22Le025823; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:02:08 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286229730; bh=XmhPkCRLptooYfN3f1lxZtla+gs=; h=Message-ID:Date: From:MIME-Version:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=CQPco15XSbDaNcHTx bASHciE2BY6WPva055zY7Vzkzk+um36bAxL6ZjoXt7rlDi1qlmpfcYv/N8otN8X51Je 2LdvZGH0B7oAlalNyOubT1rlpkMpHDUbYndlzFjmzWQEyJ2r2HWYvOMLmhll4A4QEs2 ryeO5VQwkpIv1gcBgu9s=
Received: from mail.winserver.com (mail.catinthebox.net [208.247.131.9]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o94M1sLL025817 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 15:02:00 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@isdg.net
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.5) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:00:59 -0400
Received: from opensite.winserver.com (beta.winserver.com [208.247.131.23]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.5) with ESMTP id 487501625; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:00:58 -0400
Received: by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v6.3.453.2) for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:01:14 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([99.3.147.93]) by beta.winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v6.3.453.2) with ESMTP id 2522797750; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:01:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4CAA4EF9.1090009@isdg.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 18:02:33 -0400
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Organization: Santronics Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:02:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Removal of 1st vs 3rd party statistics
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Barry Leiba wrote: > Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and > interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report > The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010. > > This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec > to Draft Standard. Everyone please review it, and post > comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think > it's ready to go. I have only one comment. The removal of very significant data points from this last revision: Author vs. Third-Party: 73% of the signatures observed were author signatures, meaning the "d=" value in the signature matched the domain found in the From: header field. The remainder, therefore, were third-party signatures. Originator signatures: 1.2 billion Third-party signatures: 184 million This is signification information. Why was it removed? Why hide this significant fact? -- HLS _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
- [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… John R. Levine
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 - Re… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Michael Thomas
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… J.D. Falk
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Ian Eiloart
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Bill.Oxley
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Hector Santos
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Rolf E. Sonneveld
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: implementation Report v02 … Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Rolf E. Sonneveld
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… Jeff Macdonald
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-… SM