Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report

"Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl> Tue, 05 October 2010 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA71B3A6F57 for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.960, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id epPxUnbW2jVL for <ietfarch-ietf-dkim-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEFE13A6C24 for <ietf-dkim-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95DR0d8010211; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:27:06 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=mipassoc.org; s=k00001; t=1286285227; bh=ECbGYQIA1slZgTZghU5j0Xr0y9c=; h=Message-id:Date: From:MIME-version:To:References:In-reply-to:Cc:Subject:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=T4NIvEB3zf0EYPlM0 aa3Gg/3Jyft8nHTA2XSJImJqeM4o8cOpmnJkmb2JL8OfOTkeiX+IfXIF4RZMaLE0+j+ eVwp2n/DjbXcbnRA8JfODAoMtU2NflUvdXLh26nWgf4MeTVAnC7QxAPJGR9pX8MLZNC I+F9DepGjzTU4Bq7G+Ds=
Received: from lion.sonnection.nl (lion.sonnection.nl [80.127.135.138]) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o95DQrMj010197 for <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>; Tue, 5 Oct 2010 06:26:58 -0700
Authentication-Results: sbh17.songbird.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.i=@sonnection.nl
Received: from [80.127.135.136] (a80-127-135-136.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.127.135.136]) by lion.sonnection.nl (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.3-11.01 32bit (built Sep 1 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L9T0020IK0RUY00@lion.sonnection.nl> for ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:26:52 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <4CAB279B.60307@sonnection.nl>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:26:51 +0200
From: "Rolf E. Sonneveld" <R.E.Sonneveld@sonnection.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=ukF2B-UJsooQKSxOfz54-Dsye0RPG_swLpWxn@mail.gmail.com>
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.1.3 lion.sonnection.nl 0L9T0020IK0RUY00
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:27:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Greylist: IP, sender and recipient auto-whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.70]); Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: DKIM Mailing List <ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Working group last call on draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
X-BeenThere: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DKIM Discussion List <ietf-dkim.mipassoc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mipassoc.org/pipermail/ietf-dkim>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-dkim>, <mailto:ietf-dkim-request@mipassoc.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org
Errors-To: ietf-dkim-bounces@mipassoc.org

  On 10/04/2010 10:41 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> Thus begins working group last call on the DKIM implementation and
> interoperability report, draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02:
>    http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report
> The working group last call will run through Friday, 22 October, 2010.
>
> This implementation report will be used to advance the DKIM base spec
> to Draft Standard.  Everyone please review it, and post
> comments/issues. Please also post here if you've reviewed it and think
> it's ready to go.

I've reviewed it and came across the following:

Chapter 2: as for DKIM specific definitions used in this document, they 
cannot be found in [EMAIL-ARCH]. Please add [DKIM] here as source of 
definitions.

Par. 3.2 - 3.4: these paragraphs are a bit 'vague', due to terms like 
'Some implementations [...]', 'Some test cases [...]', 'at least two 
implementations...'. Presumably this has to do with the fact that the 
interoperability event took place long time ago? If so, I'd suggest to 
include a sentence to describe the difficulty to gather all relevant 
information, three years after the event took place. To make these 
paragraphs a bit less 'vague' I would like to suggest to include the 
original set(s) of test messages and the original interoperability test 
plan(s), if still around somewhere.

Par. 4.1.2: [...] Where "list mail" is defined as [...]
Should this not be: [...] Where "Non-List Mail" is defined as [...]?

Murray, thanks for the work!

/rolf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html