IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Sun, 02 December 2007 00:19 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IycY4-0001R1-AZ; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:19:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IycY2-0001QG-Gq; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:19:02 -0500
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([2001:14b8:400::130] helo=smtp.piuha.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IycY2-0001gV-8c; Sat, 01 Dec 2007 19:19:02 -0500
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027621986CC; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:19:01 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3B8198671; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 02:18:59 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4751F9E9.7070508@piuha.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:18:49 -0800
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <4751F44D.3050207@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4751F44D.3050207@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Cc: iab@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

> I would like to ask a clarifying question: does this mean that RFC
> editors are not going to start editing the document until after 2
> months since approval of a document, or does it mean that RFC editors
> start editing right away, can issue AUTH48 request, but will delay
> publication until after 2 months?
>
> I think the latter is better, because (a) appeals are not that
> frequent and (b) AUTH48 usually takes way longer than 2 days ;-).
The latter. There is a handful documents in the wait state.

Jari


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email