IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se> Wed, 05 December 2007 21:54 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02Cj-0004KT-33; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:54:53 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02Ch-0004Jl-Hd for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:54:51 -0500
Received: from smtp.testbed.se ([80.86.78.228] helo=fw.testbed.se) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J02Ch-000488-4J for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:54:51 -0500
Received: from MailerDaemon by fw.testbed.se with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1J02Cg-0002Cf-8j for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:54:50 +0100
Received: from [130.129.86.87] (port=1125) by fw.testbed.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <loa@pi.se>) id 1J02Cd-0002C3-Qs; Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:54:48 +0100
Message-ID: <47571E1D.7000104@pi.se>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 22:54:37 +0100
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.se>
Organization: Acreo AB
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik@levkowetz.com>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <4751F44D.3050207@isode.com> <E1Iye5A-0002sv-6J@megatron.ietf.org> <D9AE99FE-731F-4F55-B646-B26A6C8A4485@nokia.com> <7AC22E50348D3364BD9C2749@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <28EF58DB-224B-4899-8E7C-0A938DA41B6C@nokia.com> <47571A01.6050509@levkowetz.com>
In-Reply-To: <47571A01.6050509@levkowetz.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0204.47571D8C.0182,ss=1,fgs=0
X-cff-SpamScore: 0(/)
X-cff-SpamReport: ----- ----- Message is unknown to the spam scanner.
X-cff-LastScanner: footer
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Cc: iab@ietf.org, bob.hinden@nokia.com, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, iesg <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

hmmm...

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> 
> On 2007-12-02 10:38 Bob Hinden said the following:
> ...
>>> Based on the past record, we're talking about something that  
>>> happens 0.58% of the time, or less.
>>>
>>> Of course, predicting the future from the past is iffy; there have  
>>> been 10 appeals in 2006 and only one (not document related) in  
>>> 2007, so "it varies".
>> Thanks for looking at the data.
>>
>> It seems to me that we shouldn't be delaying all new RFCs for a  
>> problem that only occurs .58% of the time.

so if we are talking about "all" documents; what is the percentage
that is (could be) actually published before 60 days and how many
days before day 60 is that (typically)

/Loa
> 
> +1
> 
> 
> 	Henrik
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Loa Andersson

Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
                                           loa@pi.se

This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. http://www.astaro.com


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email