IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 28 November 2007 22:05 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxV26-0006Ne-Po; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:26 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxV25-0006Mw-9z for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:25 -0500
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([8.8.40.152]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IxV24-0002E9-TE for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:25 -0500
Received: (qmail 27644 invoked by uid 0); 28 Nov 2007 22:05:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO THINKPADR52.vigilsec.com) (71.178.3.192) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 28 Nov 2007 22:05:14 -0000
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:05:18 -0500
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <CC3C6CC7EE08DA90C239082B@p3.JCK.COM>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <474DD597.9040208@gmail.com> <CC3C6CC7EE08DA90C239082B@p3.JCK.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: iab@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Message-Id: <E1IxV26-0006Ne-Po@megatron.ietf.org>

John:

RFC 2026 gives two months to appeal any decision.  IESG approval of a 
document publication is one such decision.  RFC 2026, section 6.5.4 says:

    All appeals must be initiated within two months of the public
    knowledge of the action or decision to be challenged.

So, the two month timer begins when the approval announcement is sent.

Russ

At 04:02 PM 11/28/2007, John C Klensin wrote:
>I don't see any possible reason why we need to give
>people two months to get an appeal filed: a month or, at most,
>six weeks ought to be more than sufficient.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email