IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com> Sun, 02 December 2007 06:15 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyi6l-0006gT-SJ; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:15:15 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyi6j-0006fK-Ae; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:15:13 -0500
Received: from smtp.nokia.com ([192.100.122.230] helo=mgw-mx03.nokia.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyi6i-0007SU-Q2; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 01:15:13 -0500
Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-mx03.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id lB26F84H010161; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:15:08 +0200
Received: from esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.183]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:15:08 +0200
Received: from mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com ([172.21.143.96]) by esebh102.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:15:06 +0200
Received: from [130.129.67.119] (daec-linuxvpn05827.americas.nokia.com [10.241.58.27]) by mgw-int01.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.5/Switch-3.2.5) with ESMTP id lB26F3Fl019145; Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:15:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <E1Iye5A-0002sv-6J@megatron.ietf.org>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <4751F44D.3050207@isode.com> <E1Iye5A-0002sv-6J@megatron.ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <D9AE99FE-731F-4F55-B646-B26A6C8A4485@nokia.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@nokia.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:15:14 -0800
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>, iab@ietf.org, iesg <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Dec 2007 06:15:06.0866 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF357520:01C834AA]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Cc:
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Before we head further down this track, do we have any data as to how  
big a problem we are thinking of fixing?

Since the IETF has been producing RFCs, how many have been appealed  
in the 2 months after IESG approval?  I would like to see the actual  
numbers.  Does this happen 10%, 1%, .1%, .01%, .001%, etc. of the time?

Bob




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email