IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Sun, 02 December 2007 17:47 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iysuj-0007TE-Jc; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:47:33 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iysui-0007R3-L9 for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:47:32 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iysui-0006eL-A7 for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 12:47:32 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IysuY-0004SM-2x for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:47:22 +0000
Received: from c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.134.88.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:47:22 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:47:22 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:49:22 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <fiur2s$64q$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <4751F44D.3050207@isode.com><E1Iye5A-0002sv-6J@megatron.ietf.org><D9AE99FE-731F-4F55-B646-B26A6C8A4485@nokia.com><7AC22E50348D3364BD9C2749@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <D1661755189D9C66DADD5ACD@[10.1.129.171]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

John C Klensin wrote:

> Of course, YMMD and, in particular, you might consider this
> potential problem to be important enough to have other criteria.

The "enhanced NOOP" discussion on the SMTP list just reminded me
that we're talking about protecting IANA, RFC editor, and Trust
from legal enforcement.

 Frank


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email