IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

sob@harvard.edu (Scott O. Bradner) Tue, 04 December 2007 03:46 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzOjU-0000nA-1p; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:46:04 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzOjS-0000mQ-MF for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:46:02 -0500
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IzOjS-0000dt-F0 for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:46:02 -0500
Received: by newdev.eecs.harvard.edu (Postfix, from userid 501) id 73DEE67532E; Mon, 3 Dec 2007 22:44:28 -0500 (EST)
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20071204034428.73DEE67532E@newdev.eecs.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 22:44:28 -0500
From: sob@harvard.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08e48e05374109708c00c6208b534009
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Harald sed:
> For the implementors, an I-D + the fact of approval is sufficient. For 
> those who write other documents, it's not - they need the RFC number.

including the folk in other SDOs that want to point to IETF documents

Scott

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email