IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch> Thu, 29 November 2007 08:50 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixf6A-0001MA-72; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:50:18 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixf68-0001LZ-4V; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:50:16 -0500
Received: from tarsus.bollow.ch ([82.195.230.222]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ixf66-0001Vu-Lp; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:50:16 -0500
Received: from tarsus.bollow.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tarsus.bollow.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E7DB28026; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:32:17 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: tarsus.bollow.ch from=nb@bollow.ch; domainkey=neutral (no signature; no policy for bollow.ch)
Received: from quill.bollow.ch (166-13.0-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.0.13.166]) by tarsus.bollow.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 10:32:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by quill.bollow.ch (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 166022202B6; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:52:52 +0100 (CET)
From: Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>
Organization: Bollow Software Economics Research
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
To: ietf@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <CC3C6CC7EE08DA90C239082B@p3.JCK.COM> (message from John C Klensin on Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:02:48 -0500)
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org> <474DD597.9040208@gmail.com> <CC3C6CC7EE08DA90C239082B@p3.JCK.COM>
Message-Id: <20071129085252.166022202B6@quill.bollow.ch>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 09:52:51 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: iab@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

> I don't see any possible reason why we need to give people two
> months to get an appeal filed: a month or, at most, six weeks ought
> to be more than sufficient.

+1

Greetings,
Norbert.


-- 
Norbert Bollow <nb@bollow.ch>                      http://Norbert.ch
President of the Swiss Internet User Group SIUG    http://SIUG.ch

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email