IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Mon, 03 December 2007 00:26 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyz9C-0002lF-FH; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:26:54 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyz9B-0002kS-3u for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:26:53 -0500
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyz9A-0007JP-PS for ietf@ietf.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2007 19:26:53 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iyz8z-0007D0-Vl for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:26:41 +0000
Received: from c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net ([62.134.88.218]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:26:41 +0000
Received: from nobody by c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:26:41 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 01:28:47 +0100
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <fivifp$ahp$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <E1IxTPt-0006r4-ST@ietf.org><474E61A4.2000201@alvestrand.no><010901c83339$b56e0d20$0601a8c0@pc6><firlnd$5h7$1@ger.gmane.org> <41DBABA8CD72B065EE053127@p3.JCK.COM><fisflk$f34$1@ger.gmane.org> <5505FD76-CD5E-4D75-BAD3-5450BAC02613@muada.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-134-88-218.hh.dial.de.ignite.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Subject: Re: Should the RFC Editor publish an RFC in less than 2 months?
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

> Could you enlighten us?

Really, no :-)  You could check what's really going
on, grab a copy of ECMA 376 and tell us what it says.
Maybe try your luck at <http://www.noooxml.org/1900>. 

With Redmond it's as with spammers, the one thing 
that's worse than spammers are the anti-spammers.

 Frank


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email