IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?

Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net> Mon, 25 July 2016 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <mstjohns@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBE812D952 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.986
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.986 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=comcast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EbNSiOeIfxwt for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51A612D94D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from resomta-po-07v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.231]) by resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id Rjeab3ANSjWBpRjfHbnavS; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:27:39 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1469467659; bh=YZQr4ChuYxvnWoWsH1bUCgpIPC7oB8JQgbg0+FNYn3o=; h=Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=aGYuRFMwrYTTuxe9Dd79gY1PWRzA4cykWouOGRMMVBYFpXu2mD0xJ0CK2MVc4+8i5 u25EyzChD7zo4C+q1ZWsNuaOYUIsutq29QlPf59KBaQQWDOk//kajbSIXm/AAS6+Gy 2pow7u90CeaSOwLPg2u1wOLpszXis7bDnzfCfw61zgx3W4nyfpEuDOm5fF6wBm1B39 erpJGTwdWzvz7AWjuW6Yn5XiZ5tvHzpVmkDwDKoI+S7GWZJPNIhMIYPtaOsJBA8Vlc S8+BTZVK0zKE4W+0v0uwXe2SgbehF7e8KIR0/oT8/amp9yRyJV5jsuDv00hYJL8qM0 XuhWQewZYhbPA==
Received: from [IPv6:2601:148:c000:1951:ccd7:589d:2636:a1d] ([IPv6:2601:148:c000:1951:ccd7:589d:2636:a1d]) by comcast with SMTP id RjfFbzMFfk7ZTRjfGbsl69; Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:27:38 +0000
Subject: Re: IETF note well relating to pictures?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20160725172300.A10911A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <716cbc1f-73c5-3537-f981-87e12aaf6fbe@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 13:27:47 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160725172300.A10911A508@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------4DDDC7533F8583B8F3908F90"
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfFCOfCJ6PGwx8A7xRHJ+HpwzjmoY0r/JzwtxXaleb7BLVlSUFqqdbUVrQ+Z0ul1IZ0ypR+r1FYLGc1eRfMvDaXs1sVOgdawFjVBKm5A2b8RS++SFKslw O2/IYNYsI5Nw8PRWdodPSAP7Uz/OUqrYwo4ulRhDksAIKtc2n2CP5P+BbbMARhdeKQG9bQR+95zXng==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0XD-BpbbIta_hzFlq-G3kCBlRWE>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 17:27:41 -0000

On 7/25/2016 1:23 PM, Martin Rex wrote:
>> >
>> >hotel function rooms are public places,
> Nope, hotel rooms are*no*  public places.
>
For the purposes of IETF, Hotel *FUNCTION* rooms ARE public places.

I agree that my private hotel room is not a public place, but that's not 
what he said.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email