IETF Logo Mail Archive

IETF note well relating to pictures?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 17 July 2016 09:54 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D3212D552 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:54:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.588
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.588 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DnEcuoUxlVUJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DEF712D507 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 828F7A6; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:54:38 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1468749278; bh=SRqlHw4eMUr0GB7Z1aAWVIT5Vs6HcSF/mceL7hoWjNA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=sdXibP1slFeQA56PfWXPhQwPDzEu6D2wny2jEQ6N8HwCzJUbjXfKemYTROB/vuq3g ox6sD4ZWVZeoAU5hEpEXoD/XG73RVP9zMM5hZltryj5I2jGr9Cmslno30Q1xHAXDFI Hs0v736/nenChdhg2wcIRjckF50t4ZBYRdKcRZPE=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A083A5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:54:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 11:54:38 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: IETF note well relating to pictures?
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1607171150370.2309@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/RzTz4P0wjkm5EXYGYVhi5jbVsww>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 09:54:43 -0000

Hi,

in the Hackathon there are a lot of pictures taken. A statement was made 
that if you didn't want pictures of yourself published, please talk to the 
organizers.

We have an IETF Note Well: https://www.ietf.org/about/note-well.html

It doesn't mention pictures, and it doesn't mention just being in the 
room, is that is a "statement" or "communication" according to the note 
well. It also doesn't list the Hackathon as a function (it's not a WG or 
BoF, right?)

So does the Note Well as written today mean that it's ok to publish 
pictures of you for just being on the premesis? I think it should be, but 
do we then need to augment the Note Well?

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email